New Stadium question

[Groucho]

So Stanley Park is a better option eh? I would have thought the other way around, but there you go.

Well a small area of if was already a sports centre car park rather than green space. Actually, it'd be the original site for Everton's first games.

 

[Cena]

As i've said before on here, if we leave Goodison, that is the end of going to home games for me

 

[ToffeeMike]

As i've said before on here, if we leave Goodison, that is the end of going to home games for me

I hope we can redevelop it, but the small area surrounding it with houses stops us.

 

[Cena]

I hope we can redevelop it, but the small area surrounding it with houses stops us.

I don't believe that. But Brennan will pull up something which backs you up so all I will say is, that I couldn't go to a home game that wasn't at Goodison.

 

[Brennan]

I don't believe that. But Brennan will pull up something which backs you up so all I will say is, that I couldn't go to a home game that wasn't at Goodison.

I wasn't going to bother tbh mate as we've had that conversation loads.

 

[ToffeeMike]

I don't believe that. But Brennan will pull up something which backs you up so all I will say is, that I couldn't go to a home game that wasn't at Goodison.

I'm sure it's been discussed already mate, no possible solution unless there would be some kind of special Architecture to figure something out.

 

[Gwladys St. Glory]

I don't believe that. But Brennan will pull up something which backs you up so all I will say is, that I couldn't go to a home game that wasn't at Goodison.

While I completely understand the sentiment...would/did you feel the same about KD? And I'm not playing devil's advo here, just asking.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

I think we'd be better off moving due to the size of the Goodison footprint.

I'd be open to a ground share providing it was equal

 

[paultheblue]

I wouldn't be adverse to a ground share but I doubt Tranmere could come up with the money

 

[ToffeeMike]

A ground share would be embarrassing as far as I'm concerned.

60,000 capacity and we'd only fill half of it.

Liverpool have a bigger fanbase so they'd fill it every week, it would give them something to laugh about.

 

[Brennan]

A ground share would be embarrassing as far as I'm concerned.

60,000 capacity and we'd only fill half of it.

Liverpool have a bigger fanbase so they'd fill it every week, it would give them something to laugh about.

We'd more than half fill a 60,000 seater stadium lid.

And Liverpool don't even sell out Anfield every week.

 

[Goat]

We would get 30k+ EASY for most games, 50k for the big uns.

IMHO!!!

 

[ToffeeMike]

We'd more than half fill a 60,000 seater stadium lid.

And Liverpool don't even sell out Anfield every week.

Hopefully like, but saying that our attendances have dropped as of late.

 

[roydo]

A ground share would be embarrassing as far as I'm concerned.

60,000 capacity and we'd only fill half of it.

Liverpool have a bigger fanbase so they'd fill it every week, it would give them something to laugh about.

Thats what I have never got on the whole new ground thing. Yeah, for 2 or 3 games a season we would fill a 50000 seater, but unless the prices were like £10 or something, the others we would be at our usual 35-39000. So why would spending squillions on a new ground improve our matchday income significantly?

 

[Bluenose1995]

I think the board need to look at trying to get outside funding help for a new stadium with them having name rights , IMO we need to be promoting the club to these middle east playboys tell them how by them part funding a new stadium on stanley park it will make a statement of how the blue side of merseyside have overtaken the reds who once planned to build on there themselves.