New Shirt Sponsor

[blueboy72]

Stake moving to sleeve sponsor next season according to Matt Hughes (Guardian)

Matt Hughes has no clue what’s going on at Everton, anything he reports is just guess work
this is the guy that basically tried to destroy us in the media when we were in our darkest hour.

 

[mahermi1]

Matt Hughes has no clue what’s going on at Everton, anything he reports is just guess work
this is the guy that basically tried to destroy us in the media when we were in our darkest hour.

Matt Hughes is a cock like, no doubting that.

 

[Timbucktoo]

Stake moving to sleeve sponsor next season according to Matt Hughes (Guardian)

Is the ban on betting ads just for the front of the shirt?

 

[BullensRoad]

Is the ban on betting ads just for the front of the shirt?

Just checked and it's only an official ban on front of shirts, but the original voluntary idea agreement between clubs was to remove gambling sponsors all together.

I know due to PSR income is extremely important now but I'd be gutted if it's stake on our sleeves, they're part of a problem by sponsoring those who appeared in the "manosphere" documentary, including fixed wins to entice the younger people who watch them stream.

How ever if it's Matt Hughes I'd take no notice, has a history of negative speculation about Everton especially during our dark last 5 years.

I'd also be surprised that it's no longer Chris Ward, unless they're now focusing on just being a lounge sponsor? They did only undertake a one year deal mind.

 

[Mr Happy]

Is the ban on betting ads just for the front of the shirt?

Well clearly so if that's true. On a side note, thought Soton kit on Saturday incorporated their sleeve sponsor well and also whilst I'm at it, noticed City with a back of shirt sponsor. Is that becoming a thing in this country now? Surely we need to get on board with that if so ?

 

[Bryan+]

Matt Hughes has no clue what’s going on at Everton, anything he reports is just guess work
this is the guy that basically tried to destroy us in the media when we were in our darkest hour.

Which dark hour, there has been a few

 

[allen]

Reading a news article on The Guardian and I’m served this ad.

Small print makes these guys sound very cool and not dodgy.

 

[davek]

CMC = scum

 

[BullensBob]

The ban only covers the front of the shirt.
Sleeves. Training kits. Stadium signage. Back of shirt. All still fair game.
Several clubs are already quietly moving their gambling partners to these locations instead.
The logo moves. The money stays. Just about.

 

[BullensRoad]

The ban only covers the front of the shirt.
Sleeves. Training kits. Stadium signage. Back of shirt. All still fair game.
Several clubs are already quietly moving their gambling partners to these locations instead.
The logo moves. The money stays. Just about.

Thanks, wonder where Chris Ward would be moving to if we move stake? Back or shirt like city?

 

[BullensRoad]

Ahh just read that city are getting £12-15m a season for Revolut on the back of their shirts.

 

[Zatara]

Reading a news article on The Guardian and I’m served this ad.

Small print makes these guys sound very cool and not dodgy.

View attachment 349212

If you're being sarcastic, how does a regulated company being transparent about retail clients chances of losing money sound "dodgy" ?

Think about it, if you dropped in £5k and started trading across equities and FX over 3 months how much do you think you'd have left?

68% of retail having a loss isnt actually bad in my opinion. Theyre paying far higher fees than professional or institutional clients and typically dont have the experience, technology or mindset in comparison.

Professionals and institutions arent always successful, its a zero sum game - there will be winners and losers.

You should be concerned if they begin advertising that retail clients generate consistent profits.

 

[Infernus]

CMC = scum

Just stunning. Stunning and brave!

 

[allen]

If you're being sarcastic, how does a regulated company being transparent about retail clients chances of losing money sound "dodgy" ?

Think about it, if you dropped in £5k and started trading across equities and FX over 3 months how much do you think you'd have left?

68% of retail having a loss isnt actually bad in my opinion. Theyre paying far higher fees than professional or institutional clients and typically dont have the experience, technology or mindset in comparison.

Professionals and institutions arent always successful, its a zero sum game - there will be winners and losers.

You should be concerned if they begin advertising that retail clients generate consistent profits.

You can go into a multi-paragraph defence of a company that is legally required to put these disclaimers on their advertisements if you wish.

 

[Zatara]

You can go into a multi-paragraph defence of a company that is legally required to put these disclaimers on their advertisements if you wish.

It's not a "defence of a company", it's pointing out something that is absolutely obvious to me, but may not be to you.

Ive seen those % in the 80s.