New Shirt Sponsor

[allen]

It's not a "defence of a company", it's pointing out something that is absolutely obvious to me, but may not be to you.

Ive seen those % in the 80s.

Oh don’t get me wrong, I love it when we have sponsors requiring disclaimers because in all likelihood you’ll lose money by utilising their services.

Top-tier and incredibly cool.

 

[summerisle]

Oh don’t get me wrong, I love it when we have sponsors requiring disclaimers because in all likelihood you’ll lose money by utilising their services.

Top-tier and incredibly cool.

Isn't that what Stake does ? Can't really see the difference.

 

[allen]

Isn't that what Stake does ? Can't really see the difference.

Exactly so.

From one bin fire to another.

 

[Zatara]

Oh don’t get me wrong, I love it when we have sponsors requiring disclaimers because in all likelihood you’ll lose money by utilising their services.

Top-tier and incredibly cool.

So no sponsors related to investing and nothing that sells products that arent adding value as you perceive it.

Are there any of the clubs sponsors you're in favour of?

Because surely in your eyes they all fall under significantly worse categories than this?

 

[allen]

So no sponsors related to investing and nothing that sells products that arent adding value as you perceive it.

Are there any of the clubs sponsors you're in favour of?

Because surely in your eyes they all fall under significantly worse categories than this?

I like ones that don’t wreck lives, mainly.

 

[chippy1722]

CMC = scum

Spot on.

 

[Zatara]

I like ones that don’t wreck lives, mainly.

That's like saying the UK banking system, the property market, stock market and other such investment based markets "wreck lives".

All sorts of ways to view things and for me it's pretty obvious (as I mentioned 2 posts ago) that if a retail client put £5k into equities and FX then traded daily for 3months you're not likely to be very successful.

If someone's going to go through and subsequently pass compliance checks to do the above then I'm not sure what to say. It's not a spur of the moment split second decision, its pre-meditated and with the risks clearly stated.

If a tier one bank, property company, or London Stock Exchange was in place of CMC would you be fine with that?

What firms would you want to see?

 

[Jimishorts]

noticed City with a back of shirt sponsor.

I switched the match on the other day and thought "who's this lad, Revolut, he looks quite good".

 

[allen]

That's like saying the UK banking system, the property market, stock market and other such investment based markets "wreck lives".

All sorts of ways to view things and for me it's pretty obvious (as I mentioned 2 posts ago) that if a retail client put £5k into equities and FX then traded daily for 3months you're not likely to be very successful.

If someone's going to go through and subsequently pass compliance checks to do the above then I'm not sure what to say. It's not a spur of the moment split second decision, its pre-meditated and with the risks clearly stated.

If a tier one bank, property company, or London Stock Exchange was in place of CMC would you be fine with that?

What firms would you want to see?

I don’t really care what your views are, and I’m not spending my evening arguing with someone I’m more than happy to disagree with.

I’m not asking you to share my morality.

 

[Rita_Poon]

i’d take that mate

Have a little patience...

 

[Aries]

I like ones that don’t wreck lives, mainly.

You didn’t like Chang either then? Cool, me neither.

 

[Jimishorts]

Have a little patience...

...could it be magic?

 

[Rita_Poon]

What firms would you want to see?

lockheed martin. ammo and the know how to use it.

 

[Rita_Poon]

...could it be magic?

Barry Manilow. tssk tssk!

 

[Yarrgh]

Thanks, wonder where Chris Ward would be moving to if we move stake? Back or shirt like city?

Surely wrist sponsors would make sense for them?