To be fair I understand the case against Jose, with the counter-argument in brackets:
- leaves clubs with a sour taste in the aftermath (excluding Inter and first stint with Chelsea).
- needs big money to fund success (well, we have that now)
- would cost about 5 times as much as Martinez (see above)
- has a mixed record in transfer market (let's be fair, so does everyone else)
- doesn't much develop the youth (that's Unsworth's job anyway)
- fell out with Rom (they'll get over it I'm sure)
I agree. Mourinho is not a natural fit for Everton and certainly not what Everton has been allowed to become. he has always been a short term manager. I think fans are going to have to get over the idea we have managers for 10 years. I don't expect any new manager we get next (with the exception of De Boer) to be with us longer than 3 years. They will either be moved on for not hitting targets, we will move beyond what they can deliver, or they will deliver it and will look for a better job.
In many ways Everton are an underdog. We have the 9th highest wage bill. We have had no real investment in the squad to speak of until a couple of years back. That was always balanced against a strong youth system. Therefore a manager that specialises in recruiting expensive older players and organising them over one that develops younger players would not make sense.
I do wonder how much that will change though. I see our revenues being driven up, especially if we were to build a new Stadium. We have a very wealthy owner who can give us that direction.
Either way, Mourinho may not be a good fit for Everton, but he is such a good manager he overcomes that. De Boer is a more natural fit and would relish working with our young players and developing our academy. I'd be happy with either of them for different reasons.