What do you mean "come on Roydo"?
My take on all this is unchanged. If its 53, 55 or 60000, my position has been firm. It will get built, it will be ace, and we will love it.
If you and others want to jump on a tweet, cos it frames your viewpoint, fine. I would respectfully suggest you look at things from a slightly different angle.
I do agree with some of the concerns RayRay, the way the survey was addressed and the almost "downgrading" of expectations from the fella Meis have certainly given me some slight concern.
I still have some major concerns regarding the whole scheme if im honest, im honestly starting to think StoneCross would have been a much "better" location in regards price to build and expansion in the future.
Im defo not claiming to be an expert on these things, but and I say this respectfully as I can, I doubt the majority of people have even the slightest clue just how hard this whole thing is going to be.
I mean first of all we are gonna be building a stadium, "on the water", water locked on 1 side and pretty much land locked on most of the other sides, in a World Heritage site, with abar 50p for materials.
Of course everybody is focusing on the capacity currently, but I am starting to have some concerns, not that it will be built, more so the fact that im slightly concerned we have committed to a site without REALLY looking into just how difficult the whole thing will be.