I'm with Brennan.
But personal prefer abc is number 3.
I don't mind number 3, i think the main 'issue' with that is that it's totally different to the current and old badge so people will be averse to it.
I'm with Brennan.
But personal prefer abc is number 3.
So you don't want people to have an opinion unless they agree with you, basically.
So what Ijjy said.
If people think number 1 is crap or rubbish or s***e then they can't have liked our old badge that much as they're actually pretty similar.
The first option solves the problem of reproduction in media while also retaining the laurels, NSNO, and name of the club. The bottom of the shield is a bit fat but it's hardly the end of the world. It looks a hell of a lot better than the current one and anybody who thinks otherwise is simply being contrary, imo.
Cant stand that on the badge.
No need for it whatsoever.
Cant stand that on the badge.
No need for it whatsoever.
Nonsense.
The first option adds NSNO and the Laurels back into the design, that alone makes it better than the current. The first option is actually pretty similar to the old badge which everybody loved.
Nonsense. I absolutely despise the current badge, it's wank, and I was really looking forward to seeing what the club had come up with - and I'm sorry, but they are terrible. They have the things fans want (NSNO, the proper tower etc), but that's no good if it looks like something designed in MS paint.
Disagree to be honest. I'd rather we didn't need it there, but sadly we do - for international branding/marketing purposes. Not everyone who sees the crest will know whose it is.
Agree I quite like number 3 the shield shape is something different to what we've had.Number 3 is very European looking. Could be Schalke or someone. Quite like it actually.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.