Mr Malkinson spent 17 years in jail for a rape he did not commit.
www.bbc.co.uk
A review has found Malkinson could have been exonerated of rape almost a decade earlier but for serious failings
www.theguardian.com
Independent review stresses danger of relying on identification evidence alone
rozenberg.substack.com
Seems the primary move (after the apology) is the removal from the CCRC of helen pitcher.
Andrew Malkinson has conducted himself with remarkable restraint and dignity throughout this ordeal, and has every right to be very angry at a litany of people who were at best incompetent and who look increasingly involved with a criminal conspiracy to enforce and protect knowingly wrongful convictions.
(I find the threshold of required evidence requiring a matched dna sample
to someone else to be quite frankly one of the most frightening aspects of apparent legal diligence I think I've ever read) (TLDR 'we don't care how innocent you are, until there's someone else to lock up, you sunshine are carrying it!')