Martinez Sentiment Poll: In or Out

[TheHumbleEgg]

GARRY MONK:

“With Roberto, I think being in League One was perfect to implement his way of playing, whereby we could make mistakes and not get punished. Roberto cared more about our tactical game being on point rather than the opposition. For instance, we never really worked on set pieces, which we probably should have done. Of course that might well be different with him in the Premier League.”

No, GARRY, no it isn't...

http://www.theguardian.com/football...nk-swansea-merseyside-derby-everton-liverpool

 

[The Equaliser]

Good to see its on fine form again tonight

Secret handshakes and tighter than a nuns minge

You creepy person you.

 

[Goat]

GARRY MONK:

“With Roberto, I think being in League One was perfect to implement his way of playing, whereby we could make mistakes and not get punished. Roberto cared more about our tactical game being on point rather than the opposition. For instance, we never really worked on set pieces, which we probably should have done. Of course that might well be different with him in the Premier League.”

No, GARRY, no it isn't...

http://www.theguardian.com/football...nk-swansea-merseyside-derby-everton-liverpool

Has he really got 2 Rs in his name?

What a complete wrong un.

 

[TheHumbleEgg]

Has he really got 2 Rs in his name?

What a complete wrong un.

Yep. Think one is contractual though, on a 5 year deal.

 

[USABlue]

I was obviously taking the piss..knew i'd get that reaction haha

 

[Allezfan]

I was obviously taking the piss..knew i'd get that reaction haha

I'm way more interested in talking about the morality of 18th century empires than about whether martinez should get sacked for the 800th time this season, tbh.

 

[USABlue]

I'm way more interested in talking about the morality of 18th century empires than about whether martinez should get sacked for the 800th time this season, tbh.

it's in the name mate. no empires have been founded on benevolence

 

[Pat's Van]

I'm way more interested in talking about the morality of 18th century empires than about whether martinez should get sacked for the 800th time this season, tbh.

yep same, conquests of latin america for me please Alf

 

[davek]

I found an Echo article I'm fully in agreement with.

*faints*.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-roberto-martinez-can-turn-8884895

 

[The Equaliser]

Some serious air-brushing of history going on here.

 

[Toffeelover]

I'm way more interested in talking about the morality of 18th century empires than about whether martinez should get sacked for the 800th time this season, tbh.

But surely all empires where ever and when ever probably had no morals but were based on immorality and suppression of the peoples of the countries?

 

[Goat]

I found an Echo article I'm fully in agreement with.

*faints*.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-roberto-martinez-can-turn-8884895

I got as far as the first line :

"We’re not playing for 0-0 said Roberto Martinez ahead of Everton’s Europa League second leg game in Kiev last night."

And therein lies the crux of the problem, we were, it would have been enough to see us through, but hes blinded by his own stupidity.

 

[Allezfan]

Some serious air-brushing of history going on here.

No irish rebellion vs the crown prior to the 20th century succeeded because none had true popular support.

 

[sageyefc]

WTF, whys there arguments over 18th century empires

 

[Goat]

WTF, whys there arguments over 18th century empires

History teaches us all valuable lessons Friend.