View attachment 56494View attachment 56495
Not a massive difference, I mean they did get Kane for free.
Sickens me 5 of our Top 10 are/were completely naff.
View attachment 56494View attachment 56495
Not a massive difference, I mean they did get Kane for free.
The above highlights that they have had their share of flops, but as you say their better players were all bought for utter peanuts.
They are proof of what can be done with the right recruitment, which Brands has shown hes very capable of in the past.
Sickens me 5 of our Top 10 are/were completely naff.
I bet not as sick as Spurs paying 19m for David Bentley when 19m was SERIOUS money.
All very true. I would just add the following....buying younger talent with a view to selling on at a profit is a simple strategy. The tricky bit comes if the team is successful and breaking up the team even gradually, would be wrong, just for the sake of the strategy. The point at which you intend selling any player becomes critical. Leave it too long and there is no value (lets call that The Mirallas Syndrome) Sell too soon and you lose value on the pitch, because a replacement is needed,and replacements don't always come through your system. Most of them are more Pendleton than DCL or Davies.
It crossed my mind how well he has recovered, its a similar injury to Seamus and its taken him this long to get back to his normal standard. Its a strange one, as i think that Jimmy would fit the pressing game very very well, it makes me think his recovery is ongoing.
I don't know how Brands plans to get around that conundrum. My feeling is that he will be quite calculated on it and be prepared to jettison the short term for the longer term goal. That's certainly the feeling for the sides on the continent who hold a very similar view to the one that Brands has outlined for Everton.
Look what happened to that Monaco side that won the French League and got to the semi finals. Sold players to the tune of about 800 million. Dortmund will break that team up too, Sancho will go but at an enormous profit which will be reinvested in 4-5-6 players that will take a bit of time. It's a risky strategy but the best chance you have of making it work is to have continuity with the coach and the DOF and the club as a whole.
Basically we sold a world class player (rather than build around him) and used the money to bake in mediocrity to the club with the purchase of a certain level of player who could perform functionally as a unit.We built our best side of the last 20 years on the back of selling Rooney (for about 8% of the total money spent in the league that year). It allowed us to fund Arteta, Cahill, Bent, Neville and to an extent Lescott, Howard, Jagielka and Baines. All those players were bought for what we received for Rooney (even though some were bought some years after following a significant price increase).
There are draw backs of course, it prevents continuity within the team and in truth it would be hard to have sustained success, but in all honesty whichever way we do things it would be hard to have sustainable success.
I think we will embrace what we are now though and it will mean there will need to be a shift in outlook from supporters to the purpose of transfer business.
This is true and I largely agree however we did immediately get 4th spot.Basically we sold a world class player (rather than build around him) and used the money to bake in mediocrity to the club with the purchase of a certain level of player who could perform functionally as a unit.
They are in a different position to us though. As top teams in their respective leagues they have the allure to attract very good youngsters and snap up quality players at reasonable prices because they are invariably in the CL.
We have nothing like that to offer, so creating and breaking up teams is not a sensible model.
Basically we sold a world class player (rather than build around him) and used the money to bake in mediocrity to the club with the purchase of a certain level of player who could perform functionally as a unit.
Would we have had the money to get in the quality of players needed to play around him?
I'd like to have found out what Rooney could have done here with a few additions. We could have tried that route if Kenwright hadn't needed to sell him to pay off loans he took out in order to control the club.
Genuinely looking forward to seeing Marcel whip up some magic this summer.
He played a match in November and has been in the Ireland squad. He has been fit for ages, broken legs don’t take 15 months to recover from, our manager just doesn’t want to use him.
They are in a different position to us though. As top teams in their respective leagues they have the allure to attract very good youngsters and snap up quality players at reasonable prices because they are invariably in the CL.
We have nothing like that to offer, so creating and breaking up teams is not a sensible model.
Basically we sold a world class player (rather than build around him) and used the money to bake in mediocrity to the club with the purchase of a certain level of player who could perform functionally as a unit.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.