Stephen Warnock on 5Live defending FFP on the basis that if a non-man u, rs type club with historic revenue wants to compete it's right that they are not allowed to spend as much as these clubs but they should 'get a better manager and scouts'.
He admitted this view was from the rs side of the fence and sums up exactly the protectionism that FFP is designed to achieve, and which clubs were behind it.
Thanks. Barcelona are the other one that interests me. Apparently over a billion in debt following the Greizman purchase. I thought the purpose of FFP was to protect clubs against financial ruin. I am aware that Barca have huge revenues but surely clubs loading themselves with debt are at greater risk of financial ruin. several years of poor form post Messi could see them in all sorts of trouble.
I thought it through fine, but thanks for your concern.10 point deduction and City could finish outside the top 4 so their CL ban would not come into play.
That piece by Martin Samuel is absolutely spot on.
The thing is Tabas the La Liga boss. Ruminegge and a few of the other giants figures in the game from the G14 have threatened a breakaway if UEFA do not do something about City and PSG, new format of CL is coming in 2-3 seasons time and UEFA is making the CL more lucrative to please these clubs and stop the breakaway.That's basically it. Unfortunately we have anti competitiveness rules, and also rules that protect against monopolies. You are not legally allowed to do what he is describing. Its morally akin to fixing the Libor rates or whatever. Its fixing the market.
UEFA have potentially made an enormous mistake with this. Putting it out in the open could mean the ramifications go beyond just City. Dont discount the possibility of further legal action. I hope City litigate them.out of existence and bring the whole corrupt pyramid down.
Should anyone really be surprised when wealthy persons, from nations with an appalling human rights record, should stop at nothing in their greedy pursuit of monetised reflected glory and acceptance..
Nothing against City as a football club - with a long history and a great community spirit - or indeed their one-time long suffering fans - but how anyone can find the attitude of the ownership to the rules and their utterly reprehensible attitude to being found out in anyway acceptable or deserving of leniency is beyond me. I hope the CAS recommend that the sentence is increased.
So is the issue the source of the money or do you believe FFP is not a sham designed to protect the position of the 'elite'?Should anyone really be surprised when wealthy persons, from nations with an appalling human rights record, should stop at nothing in their greedy pursuit of monetised reflected glory and acceptance..
Nothing against City as a football club - with a long history and a great community spirit - or indeed their one-time long suffering fans - but how anyone can find the attitude of the ownership to the rules and their utterly reprehensible attitude to being found out in anyway acceptable or deserving of leniency is beyond me. I hope the CAS recommend that the sentence is increased.
Stephen Warnock on 5Live defending FFP on the basis that if a non-man u, rs type club with historic revenue wants to compete it's right that they are not allowed to spend as much as these clubs but they should 'get a better manager and scouts'.
He admitted this view was from the rs side of the fence and sums up exactly the protectionism that FFP is designed to achieve, and which clubs were behind it.
if you are upset with this ban you are no true Evertonian, as simple as this, who cares about how/if RS will benefit or not
This so why FFP can't work. What chance do we have if we can spend 100m per year on new players whilst other clubs can spend 250m per year (legally) under FFP.City have been a stain on this league for years, The year Pep signed and they finished 4th on the final day of the season, What did they do in the summer? Spent 270m on defenders and pretty much bought the league title
Most of us have put up with them because it's halted those lot winning the league, but honestly what chance do we ever have of getting close to getting trophies if there's a side spending 500m on players in the last three seasons
T
This so why FFP can't work. What chance do we have if we can spend 100m per year on new players whilst other clubs can spend 250m per year (legally) under FFP.
The only fair system would be spend caps and salary caps that are exactly the same for all clubs, not linked to size of club and revenue.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.