I don't give a monkey's, Ad.
Lies, damned lies etc., etc.
And he hasn't even played enough games for the first team to give any substance to or draw any meaningful conclusion from those statistics.
To suggest Garbutt is anywhere near the level of Baines is just nuckin' futz.
I don't think the ratings are stats. But rather a combination of stats and an unbiased opinion.
Look through them. They all look about right considering the season we've had. Maybe saying he was close to Baines was a bit of an exageration but Baines is our best player and one if not the best players in his position in the league.
Comparing him to Baines is unfair to begin with. Comparing him to Stones, Barkley and Lukaku is much fairer and he beats them all except Stones who he's very close to and look how we rate him.
That's what we're losing. A player close to Stones in a position we will need to fill in two or three years max.