Right, since you never really reply to substantive posts from others, you don't really deserve this, but:
Perhaps you should consider exactly how much people care about this issue, and how much a tipping point has been reached, that they are willing to go into crowded public spaces to seize this moment and protest against this issue, even in spite of the risk to their lives. It's worth noting that face masks have been prevalent at most of the gatherings, which latest data suggests will reduce transmission by ~80%.
I (and many others) find it totally STUPID and IGNORANT and UNSAFE that a police officer could kneel on a person's neck for 9 minutes (including 2.5mins AFTER he was checked and found not to have a pulse, according to some reports) and for that NOT to provoke widespread outrage and protest.
To compare protests against the unlawful killing of people of colour by those charged to protect them to whether people should be allowed into stadia to watch a football match, is inane, to be honest. You can consider that a "personal attack" if you want. Most would consider it fact.
There are a number of aims of the movement. Defunding of the police in the US is a major tentpole. Defunding doesn't mean "cut all funding and scrap the police". It means a reduction in funding, which would in turn reduce the militarisation of the police. In the US the police spend huge sums of money every year on buying decommissioned military hardware. If you equip police like they're soldiers on a battlefield, it's hardly a surprise when they act like it.
They also want 8 specific changes to police procedure and their use of force. You can find what these are fairly easily with a little research.
These things don't exactly make for memorable slogans to chant during a protest. "Black Lives Matter" came about because in many countries, but especially the US, they're not treated like they do by the authorities.
Because (again, specifically in the US, as that's where the movement started, but it's mirrored here to an extent) black people have worse health and socio-economic outcomes than those of a similar background of other ethnicities.
"I don't have white privilege, I grew up poor too" isn't an argument when pretty much every bit of available data says that whatever your circumstance, changing your skin colour to black would make that circumstance worse.
Most of the organisations who are paying bail are paying bail for those arrested while protesting, not looting. But to turn attention to the looting for a moment, perhaps you'd like to turn your attention to this video that I've posted in reply to you elsewhere at least once, possibly twice, but never got a response.
Society doesn't uphold its end of the social contract for a huge segment of the population, based on little more than their skin colour. It's a bit rich to expect them to then uphold theirs.
This is a function of the media coming out of those areas and how much information people receive. Is it right that there isn't more protest? No, but that doesn't lessen any other cause.
Oh, but as for point D: Voter suppression amongst communities of colour in the US is at a horrendous level.
Viruses don't "murder" people. Murder is a conscious act. Like kneeling on someone's neck while they die beneath you. Or shooting unarmed women sleeping on a couch. Or shooting a guy out jogging.
Because, shock horror, in any large group of people you'll get people who don't react in the ideal way. The vast majority of protests in this country have been peaceful (and for that matter socially distanced)
Well said.