Current Affairs London Protests

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not racist more not arsed.

The modern left voter base is middle class white intellectuals who think they are working class and BAME.

There is currently no party in the UK that benefits white working class people in this country hence why alot have been fooled into voting Tory.

Why do you keep saying white? What special challenges do white people have to overcome?

You complain about the middle class and yet you want a centrist government? I’m not entirely sure you know what your own politics are or how they’d help the working class?
 
Ironically the racists were there causing trouble opposite sides of them.

Probably would be better if they used the protests to round them up and shame them all for their racist ways. That would get a result .


But the government aren't racist? Literally have minorities in key positions including mayor of London and home secretary.

The Government isn't racist???????????????????????????


Writing in the Telegraph in 2002, Johnson referred to a visit to Africa by the then prime minister Tony Blair.
"What a relief it must be for Blair to get out of England. It is said that the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth, partly because it supplies her with regular cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies," he wrote, referring to African people as having "watermelon smiles."

In a column written in 2002, Johnson wrote that British colonialism in Africa is "not a blot upon our conscience."
He added: "The problem is not that we were once in charge, but that we are not in charge any more."

The former foreign secretary wrote in an article for the Telegraph that "it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes," adding that any female student who appeared at school or in a lecture "looking like a bank robber" should be asked to remove it.


"To any non-Muslim reader of the Koran, Islamophobia — fear of Islam — seems a natural reaction, and, indeed, exactly what that text is intended to provoke," he wrote.
"Judged purely on its scripture — to say nothing of what is preached in the mosques — it is the most viciously sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers."


In the wake of the London bombings, he also questioned the loyalty of British Muslims and insisted that the country must accept that "Islam is the problem."
"It will take a huge effort of courage and skill to win round the many thousands of British Muslims who are in a similar state of alienation, and to make them see that their faith must be compatible with British values and with loyalty to Britain," he wrote.
"That means disposing of the first taboo, and accepting that the problem is Islam. Islam is the problem."
He added: "What is going on in these mosques and madrasas? When is someone going to get 18th century on Islam's medieval ass?"



But yeah, no racism in our government.
 
Im happy for a party to help those of all backgrounds and race to have better opportunities in life - the left however are only arsed when it comes to inequalities for minority groups and the right are only arsed about the well off.

Turkeys voting for Xmas hence why I havent voted in years - im either voting for a group who tell me im a privileged racist or one that tells me im a peasant.

Great

that is utter rubbish.
You can care about racism, sexism, homophobia classism et al, all at the same time.

Right now the debate is about racism for obvious reasons. It’s a serious problem.

That doesn’t mean social mobility and all of the factors that affect it aren’t important.

The fact that we are talking about racism doesn’t mean that inequality isn’t important.

The term ‘white privilege’ doesn’t mean that all white people live in privilege. it doesn’t mean white people can’t be poor. It doesn’t mean that white people don't face prejudice.

I share a lot of your views on inequality. But I can share those views and still care about racism and sexism and be conscious that there are systemic, structural problems that mean that racism is more complex than the overt racism that we see from the inbreds that turned up yesterday.

And I think that there are a lot of ways that addressing racism can solve a lot of the problems associated with inequality. And I think that will benefit everyone. Irrespective of the colour of their skin.
 
Putting my assuming attitude hat on... And ignoring the the bare chested swastika defender of Churchill statue yesterday.

I actually feel sorry for him and many others who have been manipulated to be their yesterday and do what they did.

They are evidently not happy and probably for same reasons that inspire those in BLM, are angry of social inequalities and all that entails in their lives.
That is very true. There are so many angry people at the moment. They're everywhere.
 
The Government isn't racist???????????????????????????


Writing in the Telegraph in 2002, Johnson referred to a visit to Africa by the then prime minister Tony Blair.
"What a relief it must be for Blair to get out of England. It is said that the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth, partly because it supplies her with regular cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies," he wrote, referring to African people as having "watermelon smiles."

In a column written in 2002, Johnson wrote that British colonialism in Africa is "not a blot upon our conscience."
He added: "The problem is not that we were once in charge, but that we are not in charge any more."

The former foreign secretary wrote in an article for the Telegraph that "it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes," adding that any female student who appeared at school or in a lecture "looking like a bank robber" should be asked to remove it.


"To any non-Muslim reader of the Koran, Islamophobia — fear of Islam — seems a natural reaction, and, indeed, exactly what that text is intended to provoke," he wrote.
"Judged purely on its scripture — to say nothing of what is preached in the mosques — it is the most viciously sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers."


In the wake of the London bombings, he also questioned the loyalty of British Muslims and insisted that the country must accept that "Islam is the problem."
"It will take a huge effort of courage and skill to win round the many thousands of British Muslims who are in a similar state of alienation, and to make them see that their faith must be compatible with British values and with loyalty to Britain," he wrote.
"That means disposing of the first taboo, and accepting that the problem is Islam. Islam is the problem."
He added: "What is going on in these mosques and madrasas? When is someone going to get 18th century on Islam's medieval ass?"



But yeah, no racism in our government.
The prime minister may well be. But he isn't passing laws or policies against black people though? So , so what if he is? As long as he doesn't use his position to enforce those racist beliefs then it makes zero difference.

Having minorities in his cabinet however , completely the opposite of being a racist government.

So yeah, so what if boris is racist if he doesn't do anything to negatively effect those he is racist against?

Completely different story if the government was actively making changes to the country aimed at negatively effecting their lives.
 
The term ‘white privilege’ doesn’t mean that all white people live in privilege.

It actually does mean that mate.

That's why I have a problem with the term, because it's self defeating when you have so many people of all races suffer from the socio-economic deprivation which actually fuels racial inequality. Blacks in our society are disproportionately part of the prison system not because of "White Privilege" but because they're more likely to be socio-economically deprived than a white person but not ALL white people.

Personally, I'd like the term replaced by something inclusive. It serves no purpose and only does harm. Any label that stereotypes an entire race or skin colour is pointless.
 
These protests can seriously affect football. If a black referee is given a red card, the white referee. Then he can be accused of racism.
 
The prime minister may well be. But he isn't passing laws or policies against black people though? So , so what if he is? As long as he doesn't use his position to enforce those racist beliefs then it makes zero difference.

Having minorities in his cabinet however , completely the opposite of being a racist government.

So yeah, so what if boris is racist if he doesn't do anything to negatively effect those he is racist against?

Completely different story if the government was actively making changes to the country aimed at negatively effecting their lives.

Bet like saying its ok for a nonce to babysit the kids as long as he doesn't stick his cock in them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top