Loan fees

[Tree13]

Well I reckon SSN are pretty wide of the mark mate. Would be amazed if we are in for more than 30% of Barrys wages.

I hope you're right pal. £2m for Barry is a better deal than £6m for Barry. FACHT.

 

[Sozzled]

Don't think anything has been confirmed yet pal. All we have to go on is SSN saying that WBA had agreed a £3m loan fee for Lukaku and that we came in with a higher bid to snatch him away. They mentioned £5m, but it was not confirmed.

Barry was widely reported in the papers last week as being on £125k a week, and City had been stubbornly refusing to subsidise a loan move to us. Maybe they caved in on deadline day, because they so desperately needed to reduce their wage bill.... or maybe we caved in and agreed to pay his £6m salary for the year.

In conclusion, no-one knows. But there is a fear the loan outlay could be more than £11m. This is Bill we're talking about, on deadline day....

I'll be amazed if there's anything left for January. We really should be looking at loaning out Duffy or Stones, or selling Heitinga, Naismith or Gueye, or some combination of these, in order to release some cash.

£5M to loan a player for a season? He best score plenty!

 

[MACCA75]

On Neville alone we would have saved almost a million in wages just between June - August!

 

[bluejock]

WE'RE NOT PAYING ANY MORE THAN HALF OF BARRY'S WAGES

STOP IT

 

[John West]

£5M to loan a player for a season? He best score plenty!

Crazy figure for a year loan.

 

[roydo]

I hope you're right pal. £2m for Barry is a better deal than £6m for Barry. FACHT.

Think I am mate. Makes no sense otherwise.

 

[Tree13]

The answer has been provided. Our wages havent gone up too much considering they went down around 250k per week when Moyes, Neville (both been gone months btw) Hitz, Fellaini and Anichebe are taken into account.

That wasn't the question sir. The question was "How much will Lukaku, Barry and Deulofeu cost us for the year." The loa fees and salaries for the players signed yesterday are still unknown to the masses and are therefore of interest/concern.

 

[roydo]

That wasn't the question sir. The question was "How much will Lukaku, Barry and Deulofeu cost us for the year." The loa fees and salaries for the players signed yesterday are still unknown to the masses and are therefore of interest/concern.

Dunno to be certain, but as an educated guess.

Lukaku £3m plus a bit.
Barry. £2mish
Barca Lad. Not much, as long as he gets a specified game time.

Just my thoughts, not ITK at all, and could be utter tripe.

 

[Pabbers]

If it was £5 million for Lukaku, so what.

If he is worth 20 million, and is on a 4 year deal, thats a £5 mil a year cost.

End of this loan deal, he will have 18 months left on his Chelsea deal

 

[Deleted member 28206]

Why are so many people, in so many threads asking the same question.

 

[Tree13]

If it was £5 million for Lukaku, so what.

If he is worth 20 million, and is on a 4 year deal, thats a £5 mil a year cost.

End of this loan deal, he will have 18 months left on his Chelsea deal

If we buy him (hypothetical) on a four year deal at £20m, that's £5m a year? Yes.

If we loan him for a year at £5m, and the repeat three times, that's £20m too (Hypothetical, I know).

The ever so slight difference between the two is that if we BUY him, we can at some point SELL him to recover some of the outlay. You can't sell a player that has been loaned to you by another club, so you cannot recover the outlay.

Did you really not think of that yourself?

 

[Tree13]

WE'RE NOT PAYING ANY MORE THAN HALF OF BARRY'S WAGES

STOP IT

http://http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/sep/03/everton-transfer-deadline-day

The Guardian implies that we are. Final paragraph:

Everton intend to offer Baines a new contract now the window has closed and, despite making a profit this summer, £2m of the Fellaini fee is owed to his former club Standard Liège while the loan deals for Lukaku and Barry will cost close to £10m. Kenwright, meanwhile, finds himself in the rare position of receiving credit where credit is due.

 

[Brennan]

http://http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/sep/03/everton-transfer-deadline-day

The Guardian implies that we are. Final paragraph:

It doesn't matter, we're not paying his full wages, common sense alone makes that obvious. We're a club who has never paid a wage higher than 75k, but now we're apparently paying a 32 year old loan signing 120k ?

 

[Tree13]

It doesn't matter, we're not paying his full wages, common sense alone makes that obvious. We're a club who has never paid a wage higher than 75k, but now we're apparently paying a 32 year old loan signing 120k ?

Mate. Whether it's a £5m "loan fee" with City covering his wages, or us paying £5m of his wages City not charging us a "loan fee", we still end up paying £5m for his services for ten months. Sell it to yourself however you like.

Or maybe it's £9m fee and wages for Lukaku, and Barry is a zero-cost loan. FFS.

 

[Brennan]

Mate. Whether it's a £5m "loan fee" with City covering his wages, or us paying £5m of his wages City not charging us a "loan fee", we still end up paying £5m for his services for ten months. Sell it to yourself however you like.

Or maybe it's £9m fee and wages for Lukaku, and Barry is a zero-cost loan. FFS.

We're not paying £5m for Barry. Again, it would make no sense from a financial point of view.

Why are you so eager to accept what a newspaper is saying ? They make stuff up 24/7.