I think the difference is timing, essentially the great transfer window acknowledged by one and all could have looked decidedly less so if baines and Felli had gone particularly at the 11th hour with no chance of replacing.
But this is how it will be done in the new paradigm at EFC.
Fellani went at the "11th hour" because Roberto had Barry signed and NcCarthy all but signed.
Otherwise it would have been no go (phew....we dodged a bullet there....would anyone want the big lad back at the expense of Barry anf Jamesie Mac?)
Ditto Baines. If Roberto had wanted to sell Baines he would have had someone lined up.....if he wanted him to stay he was staying because he is our player and is still under contract.
That's what happened.
We don't have to sell Baines in January but if we do I will have complete faith that Roberto has a plan and Baines him honour his contract wasn't a part of it.
I don't know why everyone is fretting over this.....if the first quarter season has shown us anything it is that Baines is no longer the catalyst for practically everything we do in the final third.
At the end of the day Leighton Baines is only a full back.
It's not for nowt that transfer records aren't broken to purchase full backs.
I am saying all that and I hope fervently that he stays at least until the end of the season......which I think he will.