Current Affairs Labour and Anti Semitism.......

Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed, attacking the Israeli government is not anti-semitism and is not racist, and I personally think they are a disgrace, just like attacking the Russian government is not racist. It’s an attack on what they do not what they are. Anti-semitism in the U.K. is about attacking individuals for being who they are, and not necessarily what they have done. I find it incredible that Labour are finding it so difficult to admit this and get past this issue, but then again the only defence I see on here is by attacking the Tories and whataboutary, so maybe it’s understandable.......

In support of Marc Wadsworth • Jewish Voice for Labour

Labour activist who berated MP Ruth Smeeth says he did not know ...

"Momentum Black Connexions (MBC) media officer Marc Wadsworth has been caught-up in a Fleet Street concocted firestorm after challenging a Labour MP for colluding with the right-wing press.

Wadsworth confronted the Daily Telegraph reporter Kate McCann after she questioned Jeremy Corbyn about a MBC news release she dismissively called “a leaflet” which she had handed to Labour MP Ruth Smeeth at the launch of the party’s Sami Chakrabarti report into "anti-Semitism and other forms of racism".

McCann rushed to Twitter to accuse Wadsworth of reducing Smeeth to tears (video evidence of the incident show no tears) and alleged he was guilty of using “an anti-Semitic trope” that Jewish people control the media. Wadsworth refuted what he described as a poisonous libel. He commented he had no idea Smeeth was Jewish, didn’t think Jewish people run the media and pointed out that he has a life-long record of fighting against racism and anti-Semitism, including when he was leader of the Anti-Racist Alliance. Wadsworth added that he had fought side by side with Jewish people against fascists, which resulted in him being put on a Combat 18 death list".


Mr Wadsworth said afterwards: “Jeremy said something flim-flammy that he didn’t support abuse and people must be respectful. I thought he could have been more robust than that, and said that people have strong views and it’s about freedom of speech – and what about the Telegraph working hand in glove with that Labour MP Ruth Smeeth. That’s the sort of company they’re keeping, these MPs". “I didn’t have a clue that Ruth Smeeth is Jewish. I’ve never been called anti-semitic in my life . I’ve fought against anti-semitism and racism. During the anti-apartheid struggle, I fought alongside the Jewish Board of Deputies. The Jewish people have an ally in me.”

Ruth Smeeth claimed this was an 'anti semitic attack'.

Nothing of the sort happened.

I am sure you will show evidence 'that Labour are finding it difficult to admit this and get past this issue'. As the Marc Wadsworth case shows there was no anti semitism in his remarks.
 

Marc Wadsworth never got expelled for anti semitism, he got expelled for 'bring the party into disrepute'.

The definition the Labour party are now defining as anti semitism is,

"On May 2016 the Plenary of the IHRA adopted the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

Marc Wadsworth accused Ruth Smeeth of working with the Daily telegraph, which is not anti semitic.

"Wadsworth was charged with bringing the party into disrepute, rather than antisemitism, which was not a specific offence in the Labour rulebook at the time of the incident". Hence the change to the IHRA working non legal definition of anti semitism.

He could have also said that Ruth Smeeth was passing internal Labour party information to the US Embassy, when she was the prospective Labour candidate in 2014 for Burton, and this too would not have been anti semitic.


5. (C/NF) Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20. Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.) Wikileaks.
 
Marc Wadsworth accused Ruth Smeeth of working with the Daily telegraph, which is not anti semitic.

I keep seeing this narrative being pushed, and I'll give people the benefit of the doubt and say they don't know how being subtle works. It's called an allusion.

If you take into consideration the event it was at, the religion of the person targeted and the subject matter of his 'complaint', it is pretty crystal clear what his intent was.

He thought he was being clever. He was not. Totally the correct decision to expel him and, being honest, Corbyn supporters are doing their cause no favours by not identifying this and condemning it.
 
....

He thought he was being clever. He was not. Totally the correct decision to expel him and, being honest, Corbyn supporters are doing their cause no favours by not identifying this and condemning it.


1501512610252
 
I keep seeing this narrative being pushed, and I'll give people the benefit of the doubt and say they don't know how being subtle works. It's called an allusion.

If you take into consideration the event it was at, the religion of the person targeted and the subject matter of his 'complaint', it is pretty crystal clear what his intent was.

He thought he was being clever. He was not. Totally the correct decision to expel him and, being honest, Corbyn supporters are doing their cause no favours by not identifying this and condemning it.

Marc Wadsworth said he didn't know that Ruth Smeeth was Jewish. He made no reference to her religion. Having a 'go' at someone with no reference to their religion is not anti semitic. If someone on the door in her constituency said to her something, about she is saying the same thing as the Telegraph or she is like a Tory, does that mean they are anti semitic because she is a Jewish woman. Marc Wadsworth has stood shoulder to shoulder with Jewish organisations against the NF, BNP and other fascist and racist organisations.

The event was about anti semitism. Was everyone at that meeting Jewish? Marc Wadsworth was stupid to bring up that Ruth Smeeth was handed a press release by Kate McCann of the Daily Telegraph at that meeting. If the Labour rule book said Section 26 1.6 says you can be expelled for 'stupidity' then he would have no argument. It was not the right time nor place but it was not anti semitic what he said, despite what the meeting was about.

Marc Wadsworth should have brought the Telegraph issue up later.

He could have also said that Ruth Smeeth was passing internal Labour party information to the US Embassy, when she was the prospective Labour candidate in 2014 for Burton, and this too would not have been anti semitic.


5. (C/NF) Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20. Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.) Wikileaks.

There is no reason to condemn Marc Wadsworth for anti semitism. Because he did not make an anti semitic remark. It is pretty crystal clear his intention was not anti semitism.
 
I keep seeing this narrative being pushed, and I'll give people the benefit of the doubt and say they don't know how being subtle works. It's called an allusion.

If you take into consideration the event it was at, the religion of the person targeted and the subject matter of his 'complaint', it is pretty crystal clear what his intent was.

He thought he was being clever. He was not. Totally the correct decision to expel him and, being honest, Corbyn supporters are doing their cause no favours by not identifying this and condemning it.

What? You're really kidding yourself if you think this is in any way anti-semitic.

He called out a Labour MP colluding with a right-wing newspaper. There's nothing conspiratorial about it, it's just sabotage of the party she works for. Literally f all to do with her religion and you know that.

As @hullefc said above, what he did was stupid, but there's not a chance in hell it was worthy of expulsion.
 
OK to spell it out...

In 2016 Smeeth felt she had to leave the launch event of the Chakrabarti report into tackling racism within Labour after Wadsworth accused her of working “hand-in-hand” with the Daily Telegraph to damage Jeremy Corbyn.

Accusations that Jewish people are part of a media conspiracy are a traditional anti-Semitic attack.

This is what I mean by it being an allusion, and to be quite blunt it wasn't even subtle. The idea that he goes off on a tirade like that, at an event about anti-semitism, about a Jewish MP, with said MP part of a 'rival' faction in the Labour party, and somehow not mean it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Again, you are doing yourselves no favours by not acknowledging the obvious here. You prefer to push a narrative of an establishment witch hunt because you like being the underdogs, rather than understand there's a problem in your ranks that needs addressing and is abundantly clear to everyone.
 
OK to spell it out...



This is what I mean by it being an allusion, and to be quite blunt it wasn't even subtle. The idea that he goes off on a tirade like that, at an event about anti-semitism, about a Jewish MP, with said MP part of a 'rival' faction in the Labour party, and somehow not mean it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Again, you are doing yourselves no favours by not acknowledging the obvious here. You prefer to push a narrative of an establishment witch hunt because you like being the underdogs, rather than understand there's a problem in your ranks that needs addressing and is abundantly clear to everyone.

To be honest, I find the whole conspiracy about the media being out to get Corbyn and the left of the Labour party bonkers. The sad thing is that folk that I usually regard as rational people can't seem to see the similarities between it and the nonsense spouted by Trump and other populists who bemoan the 'mainstream media'.
 
OK to spell it out...



This is what I mean by it being an allusion, and to be quite blunt it wasn't even subtle. The idea that he goes off on a tirade like that, at an event about anti-semitism, about a Jewish MP, with said MP part of a 'rival' faction in the Labour party, and somehow not mean it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Again, you are doing yourselves no favours by not acknowledging the obvious here. You prefer to push a narrative of an establishment witch hunt because you like being the underdogs, rather than understand there's a problem in your ranks that needs addressing and is abundantly clear to everyone.

To be honest, I find the whole conspiracy about the media being out to get Corbyn and the left of the Labour party bonkers. The sad thing is that folk that I usually regard as rational people can't seem to see the similarities between it and the nonsense spouted by Trump and other populists who bemoan the 'mainstream media'.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I give up.
 
OK to spell it out...

In 2016 Smeeth felt she had to leave the launch event of the Chakrabarti report into tackling racism within Labour after Wadsworth accused her of working “hand-in-hand” with the Daily Telegraph to damage Jeremy Corbyn.

Accusations that Jewish people are part of a media conspiracy are a traditional anti-Semitic attack.


This is what I mean by it being an allusion, and to be quite blunt it wasn't even subtle. The idea that he goes off on a tirade like that, at an event about anti-semitism, about a Jewish MP, with said MP part of a 'rival' faction in the Labour party, and somehow not mean it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Again, you are doing yourselves no favours by not acknowledging the obvious here. You prefer to push a narrative of an establishment witch hunt because you like being the underdogs, rather than understand there's a problem in your ranks that needs addressing and is abundantly clear to everyone.

"In a statement today, Ruth Smeeth said: “I welcome the outcome of this investigation and am relieved that after nearly two years this matter has finally been resolved.

“I am incredibly grateful for the support I have received throughout this ordeal from my friends and colleagues. I would also like to pay tribute to the hard work and professionalism of Labour Party staff who have had to deal with this case and many others, often in the face of vicious criticism.

“Abuse, bullying and intimidation have no place in our movement, as today’s announcement has proven. I hope that this decision represents the first step towards a return to the values of decency and respect throughout the Labour Party.”

On Friday, Smeeth doesn't mention anti semitism in her press release about Marc Wadsworth being expelled from the Labour party. Marc Wadsworth wasn't expelled due to anti semitism. She doesn't even allude to Marc Smeeth being anti semitic in her press release. Ruth Smeeth doesn't use subtle language to claim Marc Wadsworth is anti semitic.

What you quoted - "In 2016 Smeeth felt she had to leave the launch event of the Chakrabarti report into tackling racism within Labour after Wadsworth accused her of working “hand-in-hand” with the Daily Telegraph to damage Jeremy Corbyn.

Accusations that Jewish people are part of a media conspiracy are a traditional anti-Semitic attack".

Is someones opinion about the relationship between 'hand in hand with the Telegraph' and 'media conspiracy'.

Could you point out where, when Marc Wadsworth made reference to Ruth Smeeth, who he didn't know was Jewish, was working 'hand in hand with the Telegraph' that means he was claiming that 'Jewish people are part of a media conspiracy' and a a result is 'a traditional anti-Semitic attack' in the IHRA definition?

"Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

Or maybe in this,

"To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits".

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

 Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

 Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

 Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

 Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

2  Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

 Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

 Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.  Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

 Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

 Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.  Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries".

Marc Wadsworth was making a political comment and not an anti semitic comment. He was stupid to raise the issue of Ruth Smeeth and the Daily Telegraph reporter Kate McCann and his press release, at that event about 'Inquiry into antisemitism and other forms of racism'. He should have raised the issue through other Labour party channels. Then he could have also raised why Ruth Smeeth is informing the US Embassy about the internal goings on in the Labour party and whether she is breaking Labour party rules.
 
To be honest, I find the whole conspiracy about the media being out to get Corbyn and the left of the Labour party bonkers. The sad thing is that folk that I usually regard as rational people can't seem to see the similarities between it and the nonsense spouted by Trump and other populists who bemoan the 'mainstream media'.

Interesting. Some may disagree with that sentiment.

Journalistic Representations of Jeremy Corbyn in the British Press - LSE

Journalistic Representations of Jeremy Corbyn in the British Press

From "Watchdog" to "Attackdog"

Project Director: Dr Bart Cammaerts

This research project provides a sound and theoretically informed analysis of the various (or unison) media representations of the rise of Jeremy Corbyn as a candidate for the Labour leadership and of him as the new leader of the largest opposition party in the UK. Furthermore, this project also aims to make a contribution to the ongoing public debate regarding the role of mainstream media and of journalists in a media-saturated democracy.

We set out to recognise and acknowledge the legitimate role of the press to critique and challenge the powers that be, which is often encapsulated by the metaphor of the watchdog. Our systematic content analysis of a representative sample of newspaper articles published in 8 national newspapers between 1 September and 1 November 2015, however, shows that the press reacted in a highly transgressive manner to the new leader of the opposition, hence our reference to the attackdog metaphor.

Our analysis shows that Corbyn was thoroughly delegitimised as a political actor from the moment he became a prominent candidate and even more so after he was elected as party leader, with a strong mandate. This process of delegitimisation occurred in several ways: 1) through lack of or distortion of voice; 2) through ridicule, scorn and personal attacks; and 3) through association, mainly with terrorism.

All this raises, in our view, a number of pressing ethical questions regarding the role of the media in a democracy. Certainly, democracies need their media to challenge power and offer robust debate, but when this transgresses into an antagonism that undermines legitimate political voices that dare to contest the current status quo, then it is not democracy that is served.

Download the full report

Jeremy Corbyn and the Press


Authors of the Report: Dr Bart Cammaerts, Brooks DeCillia, João Carlos Magalhães, Dr Cesar Jimenez-Martinez

Additional Coders: Jae Aron, Tomas Borsa, Rachel Choong, Lu Fang, Rosanna Hutchings, Bhavan Jaipragas, Zhiyi Li, Deirdre Livingston, Sam Mejias, Bingchun Meng, Giorgia Salvatico and Natali Schejtman

Of course it may have changed since this report by the LSE.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top