4737carlin
Player Valuation: £90m
Missed him today
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Those two highlighted cost the club over £30m combined, and Walcott I reckon is on about the same wage as Mirallas. Can you honestly say that the club did good business loaning Mirallas out and bringing these two in?
He's at the tail end of his career, sure. But if we got decent offers for Walcott and Tosun, I'd happily sell them both and bring Mirallas back into the squad for whatever's left of his contract.
None of them are worth their salaries and shouldn't be in the club. They offer nothing. Is that better?Good squad players? Really? I'll grant you that neither of them appear to be bad apples in terms of squad harmony, but they don't contribute much on the field and they don't push the starting XI players. The commentators last week were openly mocking United for conceding a goal to Walcott. The prices paid for Walcott and Tosun, plus Walcott's wages, make it clear that they were not purchased to be squad rotation players - they were supposed to be starters. I'm not saying Mirallas is miles better than either of them - I'm saying that the club spent a large amount of money on two players who are certainly no better than Mirallas, and he could provide the bench cover they both currently provide.
You support the decision to put one highly-paid player out on loan, whilst buying in two more for substantial transfer fees, paying them comparable wages to the player you've loaned out and getting nothing more in terms of productivity for either of them. Sound business, that. I'm glad there's no chance of you ever handling Everton's finances or transfers.
Kinda like Fiorentina does every week.Missed him today
Kinda like Fiorentina does every week.
Makes more sense than the previous point to which I replied, yes.None of them are worth their salaries and shouldn't be in the club. They offer nothing. Is that better?
I can't deny that it seems inconsistent. Walcott however has scored double digits in the league twice, certainly has put up more impressive numbers than Kevin Mirallas, and is a year and half younger. He seems to work hard and have a great attitude as has been said before. So I do think he's a bit better a player.Makes more sense than the previous point to which I replied, yes.
I can accept people saying Mirallas's time at the club is over. I can't handle people suggesting Walcott is any better a winger, or Tosun is any better a striker, because the stats don't back that up. We spent a LOT of money on those two and the reason I would get shot of them before Mirallas is that they are both more likely to attract half-decent fees because they are younger (albeit not by much).
All three will be gone by the end of January 2020 anyway.
Him and shani tarashaj will push us on to the top 4. Pity Ashley Williams is out of contract though.Be like a new signing in the summer
Trees mate you and I had a long discussion about this guy quite a while back and I thought you'd maybe by your absence on this thread come to realise what he's like.Those two highlighted cost the club over £30m combined, and Walcott I reckon is on about the same wage as Mirallas. Can you honestly say that the club did good business loaning Mirallas out and bringing these two in?
He's at the tail end of his career, sure. But if we got decent offers for Walcott and Tosun, I'd happily sell them both and bring Mirallas back into the squad for whatever's left of his contract.
Move on he had his day with us.He will always have my respect though, for snapping that gutter rat Suarez in half.
Please don't halt Corky's quest for likes.Suarez got up and scored in that game.
Him and shani tarashaj will push us on to the top 4. Pity Ashley Williams is out of contract though.