Jo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jo will not be as bad as he is today if we had not use long ball for large part of the game.

I blame the tactic and our attacking approach. You can put Eto up front today and he'll be [Poor language removed] too.

And that
 

He's a matchstick, and he was rubbish today, but he's not to blame for the performance. Our midfield was [Poor language removed].
 
Our midfield was [Poor language removed] because some fu.ckers for whatever f.uck reasons kept playing it long at the back.
 
Probably because our midfielders were moving it sideways and backwards, thus forcing the defenders to initiate attacks.
 

He was absolute gash today, even without blaming the service - he couldnt control the ball and was f*cking anonymous. Yes the rest of the team was [Poor language removed] but he's not immune from criticism.

Boss player when you're 2-0 up or home against Hull but massively underwhelming in other games.

GET VAUGHAN ON.
 
He was absolute gash today, even without blaming the service - he couldnt control the ball and was f*cking anonymous. Yes the rest of the team was [Poor language removed] but he's not immune from criticism.

Boss player when you're 2-0 up or home against Hull but massively underwhelming in other games.

GET VAUGHAN ON.


If I lick you, are you rum n raisin? or mint choc chip?



i think you is tasty likes
 
He was poor, as has been said.

He's the least of out problems though. Our third choice striker with a piss poor midfield behind him. Speaks for itself really.
 
He was absolute gash today, even without blaming the service - he couldnt control the ball and was f*cking anonymous. Yes the rest of the team was [Poor language removed] but he's not immune from criticism.

Boss player when you're 2-0 up or home against Hull but massively underwhelming in other games.

GET VAUGHAN ON.

He's made of Pringles that lad.

Jo's getting used as a 6ft John Carew type because Fellaini was playing, because it would be Fellaini who we use for that stuff.

Both completely wrong.
 

He was poor, as has been said.

He's the least of out problems though. Our third choice striker with a piss poor midfield behind him. Speaks for itself really.

Funny as I thought he was alright today.

What part of Jo's play today was poor?

He didn't get great service as usual. When he did get it, he maintained possession and didn't give it way. The one time he was able to face up and take player on, he almost beat two until Murphy hacked him down outstide the box.

I think Jo's issues aren't Jo. It's that our midfield can't get him the ball on a regular basis.

I'm glad we have him (on loan mind.)
 
Jo needs service

if we play long ball he won't do a thing when by himself
if Yaks ups there with him yak maybe able to control the long ball and play it to him
but when he's by him self he won't be useful unless we give it to his feet

today highlights how much we miss arteta

the only player that looked like giving Jo service was Fellaini, who he came off for
 
He was absolute gash today, even without blaming the service - he couldnt control the ball and was f*cking anonymous. Yes the rest of the team was [Poor language removed] but he's not immune from criticism.

Boss player when you're 2-0 up or home against Hull but massively underwhelming in other games.

GET VAUGHAN ON.

Don't you see why this is?

because when were dominating a team like hull we play properly (not long ball), in other games we hoof the ball long and in this situation no striker will be succsesful
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top