James McCarthy

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

I do yes. But like you not seen loads and loads. As he hasn't played loads and loads. Would be a risk. Like everyone.

Every player is a risk

 

[ijjysmith]

Every player is a risk

I literally said that at the end.

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

I literally said that at the end.

I was merely repeating it sweet cheeks, for added effect

I think, I'm a bit distracted at the moment

 

[ijjysmith]

I was merely repeating it sweet cheeks, for added effect

I think, I'm a bit distracted at the moment

I think you're a bit distracted at the moment.

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

I think you're a bit distracted at the moment.

About a quarter to ten

Err, wait, what?

 

[Osamabindiesel]

I was merely repeating it sweet cheeks, for added effect

I think, I'm a bit distracted at the moment

Too busy changing avatars. Identity crisis

 

[Khalekan]

theres a year in it, i wouldnt be keeping him just cos hes a year younger than them two

True.

We should keep him because at his best he is at least the equal of the two of them.

And he is still younger

 

[mightymoyes]

True.

We should keep him because at his best he is at least the equal of the two of them.

And he is still younger

hes had one decent season at the top level in his career. sure give him a pay rise too.

 

[mightymoyes]

He's ready for first team PL Football, which puts him on par with our entire Central Midfield, below only Gana and Schneiderlin, which is where Jimmy Mac also is

Jimmy Mac goes in the summer, Loftus-Cheek comes in, all is well

He and Davies are both young and could be the future midfield axis of the club for years to come

you watch much chelsea training?
hes 21 now too. no way we should be giving other teams youth products a go in our squad ahead of our own.

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

you watch much chelsea training?
hes 21 now too. no way we should be giving other teams youth products a go in our squad ahead of our own.

But if we signed him he'd be our player, so what's the problem?

Which youth product would he leapfrog anyway?

Him and Davies could be our first choice midfield pair in a couple of years. I'd argue we'd be in an excellent position were that to happen

 

[Baines' left foot]

you watch much chelsea training?
hes 21 now too. no way we should be giving other teams youth products a go in our squad ahead of our own.

I rather famously said I'd rather we develop Anichebe than loan Lukaku many moons ago.

 

[Professor Toffee]

Every player is a risk

especially if they're tooled up!

 

[mightymoyes]

I rather famously said I'd rather we develop Anichebe than loan Lukaku many moons ago.

lukaku was a proven premier league player, loftus cheek is 21 and barely played a first team game!

 

[ijjysmith]

you watch much chelsea training?
hes 21 now too. no way we should be giving other teams youth products a go in our squad ahead of our own.

As you say, he's 21 now, time for him to come to a team where he may actually get games. We'd need to job off J-Mac first though. Which i'm fine with generally.

But we're not even linked with RLC anyway so it's all moot.

 

[mightymoyes]

But if we signed him he'd be our player, so what's the problem?

Which youth product would he leapfrog anyway?

Him and Davies could be our first choice midfield pair in a couple of years. I'd argue we'd be in an excellent position were that to happen

walsh and davies, thought nothing to suggest hes better than either. thankfully this is just forum chat and we're not after him so he can go to brighton or sheff wednesday.