magicjuan
Player Valuation: £60m
Racist sex pest is another band name, yayI've middle fingered you because you're a racist sex pest who never answers questions. Hope that helps.
Racist sex pest is another band name, yayI've middle fingered you because you're a racist sex pest who never answers questions. Hope that helps.
Excellent point.The whole principle of a nation, any nation, having a God-given right is picked apart in Isaiah.
"Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing...
All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity... he maketh the princes and judges of the earth as vanity"
It was ALWAYS about a land grab. This is west Bank.
I don't believe that, and I don't need to believe it to count what Israel is doing as wrong. All I need is Machiavelli, which is a very low bar to clear. The duty of a 'prince' is to take care of their citizens. It's to provide them with security, and protect them from dangers without and within. That is the entirety of their duty.The whole principle of a nation, any nation, having a God-given right is picked apart in Isaiah.
"Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing...
All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity... he maketh the princes and judges of the earth as vanity"
The whole principle of a nation, any nation, having a God-given right is picked apart in Isaiah.
"Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing...
All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity... he maketh the princes and judges of the earth as vanity"
This deserves a new thread!Excellent point.
When studying Scripture it is vital to understand the context:
Who is the author, what is the background before, during and after the text was written, who is the audience, what is the purpose that the author is trying to achieve.
Too often texts are cited completely out of context and wrongly applied to situations in modern times, very inappropriately.
1 Sam 15:3 is part of a narrative where Saul is the first King of a united kingdom of Israel. Samuel the prophet is his adviser..
Samuel tells Saul that he received a divine message for war against the Amalekites who had attacked the Israeli test on their exodus from Egypt. They had blocked their passage and ambushed the slower Isrealites who lagged behind Deut 25:17-19. This is why Amalek is to suffer.
However, later verses show that the Lord was not happy with Saul's kingship v15: 10, and He tells Samuel this vv17-31.
Saul's kingship is doomed vv 28-9 and the Lord has rejected him.
Now some context:
1 Samuel is part of a larger narrative known as the Deuteronomic History that told the story from the eve of conquest to the fall of the monarchy ,(in fact monarchies, as the United kingdom split into northern and southern kingdoms when the northern Ten Tribes rejected Solomon's successor Rehoboam) and the exiles - northern Kingdom in 721 BC and the Southern with the fall of Jerusalem and destruction of the first Temple in 586 BC.
It sets to focus on power and justice and to make these political themes personal focusing on actions and motives of PARTICULAR people and events as the shape of Israel is being formed.
Scolars will say that the authors of these exts were creative in their appropriation of material making it difficult to discern the true historicity of a text.
Some say the Books of Samuel were written as late as the Hellenistic period when the Greeks conquered, and caused outrage by putting pagan statues in the Temple thus defiling it. This led to the Macccabean revolt against the Greeks and texts like this were desigto rally the Hebrews against the invaders (2nd century BC).
Others put them earlier when Assyria was threatening Jerusalem and the southern Kingdom, but before tg actual conquest and Exile (6 th century BC).
Either way, they are designed to rise the blood of the audience against a clear and present enemy by using a narrative that describes earlier conflict ( Saul and David lived around 1000 BC)
Sadly, Netanyahu and his Government are justifying wholesale slaughter of innocents by reference to ancient texts, that may even be pure fictions and myths.
The passage from Isaiah quoted by @PhilM above is very typical of how important it is to avoid using other texts out of context.
Ezekiel by contrast speaks of Godpromising:
I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.
Sadly Netanyahu and co seem to still have hearts of stone.
I do not condone in any way any atrocities by Hamas on innocents. Israel has a right to defend itself but it must be proportionate and consistent with International Law.
Palestinians are also entitled to live in peace in a homeland of their own. The actions of extremists amongst settlers is very disturbing and clearly Netanyahu is egging them on with statements like this
Hopefully there will be more of this, and all right minded people there join them.
Phew, I thought my wife had logged on for a minuteA Sunday morning fingering from @Noisy noise annoys lol
Phew, I thought my wife had logged on for a minute
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.