Current Affairs Israel is an apartheid state

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry, but I think this amounts just to a lengthy 'blame the victims' essay.

"The opportunity was there to turn Gaza into a tourist attraction where other industries could be built". A "Dubai on the Mediterranean." I mean, come on FFS. How on earth could that happen when it was still a giant 'kin prison and suffering from periodic murderous incursions by the Israeli military for having the temerity to choose their own political leadership.

This is just nuts.

And it doesn't matter who's in charge: Fatah, Hamas, or Uncle Tom Cobley and all. There'll always be an excuse to kettle them into their prison unable to leave and facing harassment and misery. The Israeli state depends on a constant harassment of the West Bank and Gaza. That's the reality of the situation. As Netanyahu stated: "It's to our benefit that Hamas rule in Gaza". The far right policy of the Israeli Government whipped up by religious fundamentalists...sorry...'terrorists' meant they'd constantly inflame the situation in Gaza (and in Jerusalem - the West Bank), and that's been the conditions under which last Saturday's explosion of violence occured.

You may know a lot more detail about the Gaza situation but it doesn't make you right. It does no one's argument any good to blithely ignore those structural reasons for this present conflict.
Excellent post

Bigmick does indeed know his stuff, unfortunately it is always paints the Palestinians as the issue.
 
Last Tuesday my wife wrote this for one of the NGOs that we support. It has since been picked up and published elsewhere so she's allowed me to translate it and post it on here, minus the opening section which contained personal details of the events of 7th October. I've added a few explanatory notes at the end.

It's probably too long to post on here, but some people may be interested enough to plough through it. Obviously there have been developments since.
...
Thanks for taking the time to post – I can't say I agree with all of what you've said but it was an interesting read all the same. The assessment of Hamas is very true, but the potential of Gaza post-2005 is... erm... idealistic, to put it politely.

I would say though, for an article proclaiming its neutrality, that this comes across as incredibly one-sided.
 
It is a rare thing in a war when both sides want the same goal, bloodshed of Palestinians. For Israel it is the payback for their dead, for hamas it is a clarion call for more fighters to take up arms. And so the situation escalates, Israel can't be seen to be backing down and hamas has plenty of rockets with which to egg them on.
Someone needs to ask the Israelis, "what multiple of Palestinian deaths is enough to satisfy you for your dead?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top