The EU Pete....they're building an army!!!!!!You are not under threat of immediate and terrible war. But if so, from whom, supported by whom.....
The EU Pete....they're building an army!!!!!!You are not under threat of immediate and terrible war. But if so, from whom, supported by whom.....
Thats 3% by my reckoning.A central bank that can't deduct 1.5 from 4.5It says that with an agreed Brexit deal, the Irish economy should grow by about 4.5% this year, but in a no-deal scenario that would fall to 1.5% - a rate last seen in 2013.
A. It may be the report that's wrongThats 3% by my reckoning.A central bank that can't deduct 1.5 from 4.5
Seems like your reckoning needs working on.Thats 3% by my reckoning.A central bank that can't deduct 1.5 from 4.5
Thats 3% by my reckoning.A central bank that can't deduct 1.5 from 4.5
A. It may be the report that's wrong
B. An agreed Brexit isn't the current position, it is one of a range of possible outcomes that would have damaging consequences. Agreed deal 4.5%, no deal 1.5%, but you've, either deliberately or through lack of awareness, not considered that it hasn't happened yet.
Sounds like your reckoning needs some wor
Seems like your reckoning needs working on.
They project a 3% difference in the growth rate between a deal scenario and a no deal one. Not sure what is unclear about that.
I'm not agreeing it's 3%. There's a range of different scenarios so simply deducting 1.5 from 4.5 doesn't work.Wow, impressive guys. You are all agreeing that it’s 3% and not the ‘up to 4%’ as stated, yet you still manage to argue with each other.......
The Central Bank presented their estimates of the difference in growth rate between the deal or no deal scenarios. The 'up to 4%' is likely to be the estimate of the difference between the growth rate if there is no deal and no Brexit at all. But you probably know that anyway and are trying to manipulate the figures to suit your argument.Wow, impressive guys. You are all agreeing that it’s 3% and not the ‘up to 4%’ as stated, yet you still manage to argue with each other.......
It would appear that your reading skills are not what they should be.It quite clearly says 4% in your original post !Sounds like your reckoning needs some wor
Seems like your reckoning needs working on.
They project a 3% difference in the growth rate between a deal scenario and a no deal one. Not sure what is unclear about that.
What says 4% ? Why don't you quote the whole post instead of selecting a line from it and then comparing it to something you didn't quote.It would appear that your reading skills are not what they should be.It quite clearly says 4% in your original post !
No matter how many times i read it, I still get 3%The Central Bank has warned that a no-deal Brexit could reduce the growth rate of the Irish economy by up to 4% this year. In its first quarterly report of the year, the Central Bank says the impact would be front loaded, and describes the short term economic challenges as immense. In one of the starkest bulletins since the economic crisis, the Central Bank warns of the severe impact that a no-deal Brexit could have on the Irish economy. It says that with an agreed Brexit deal, the Irish economy should grow by about 4.5% this year, but in a no-deal scenario that would fall to 1.5% - a rate last seen in 2013.
Are you just subtracting 1.5 from 4.5?No matter how many times i read it, I still get 3%
The Central Bank presented their estimates of the difference in growth rate between the deal or no deal scenarios. The 'up to 4%' is likely to be the estimate of the difference between the growth rate if there is no deal and no Brexit at all. But you probably know that anyway and are trying to manipulate the figures to suit your argument.
Do you understand the concept of interpretation?I’m not even in the argument. Three of you are arguing over the same information......
Do you understand the concept of interpretation?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.