The Guardian can always be relied on to, in Tebbitt's words 'protect the establishment', when they have decided a certain figure, movement or government are not to the liking of the ruling class. They hide behind their 'liberalism' to put out the same crap as the rest of the media. Always the tailenders they never really expose the dirty deals of the British state. Amongst the general dross of their own political and social beliefs, the odd one or two articles are 'hard hitting' but very few and and far between. No wonder the general public have such a low opinion of journalists in general.
Humbert Wolfe knew a thing or two about British hacks when writing in the 1920s and 1930s. A time of unprecedented economic, social and political unrest when the establishment was threatened with upheaval.
Though his works are little read today, the following
epigram from
The Uncelestial City continues to be widely known and quoted:
You cannot hope
to bribe or twist,
thank God! the
British journalist.
But, seeing what
the man will do
unbribed, there's
no occasion to.
The Guardian is no better or worse than the rest. It is the sanctimonious pomposity, like the defence of the BBC, that the Guardian is 'different' that is galling. They feed the same bull as the rest maybe with bigger words and longer articles than the tabloids.