I think
@atrottel's point was more to do with the fact that it was deemed OK or necessary to bail out massive financial organisations around the world (admittedly not so much in the US) yet when a country finds itself in similar circumstances then there's much less commitment to help other than on the most stringent terms which usually effect the people on the street rather than the people responsible for the situation.
There's no free lunch here in letting Greece drop out of the Euro. Not only will it have huge implications for the Greeks, but it will have huge implications for other countries on the periphery in economic terms. Spain and Portugal should be looking over their shoulders. Two other points - once the EU drops one of its own then that drives a huge hole through the EU community. Imagine the scenario in the States where one particularly poorly performing State (in economic terms) is told by Washington, "sorry guys, you're out of the US Dollar" - that's what we are talking about here.
Secondly, let's remember the role of the institutions in this mess. It was Goldman Sachs who devised products that allowed Greece and other nations to hide their true indebtedness to meet Euro convergence criteria. Products which subsequently proved enormously costly as they unraveled in the chaos of 2007/8.
Greece needs reform for sure, but the least expensive way of dealing with the problem is retaining the Euro and their EU membership, supporting their economy (which in EU terms is tiny) and seeking reform especially in tax collection.