Shh Chester, she is clearly the victim of theWhat on Earth did she think was going to happen when she decided to effectively torpedo her own party? That the Republican establishment were going to give her a hug and a pat on the head?
She’s just found out the true meaning of “cutting off your nose to spite your face”Shh Chester, she is clearly the victim of theestablishmentFAFO.
Gawd knows how but the GOP are currently trouncing Dems on “best for the economy” question in election polls so you’d think the smart move would be to at least pretend to want to govern - instead they shoot the leader of the only branch of government they control (and the 3rd speaker in a row they have stabbed) causing even Fox to say “why can’t the GOP get anything done in the House”.She’s just found out the true meaning of “cutting off your nose to spite your face”
It is a hilarious situation in general though. What an incredibly stupid way to set fire to their own party after what should’ve been a relatively routine approval of the debt ceiling.
Also funny because McCarthy is a MAGA cockroach.
True, however to be fair I still think that leaving him to his fate was good politics from the Dems, even if they were kinda railroaded into doing it. Realistically McCarthy was behaving like a reactionary anyway, like with the absolutely absurd impeachment enquiry that they have no evidence for, and giving the far right lunatics committee positions etc. the only massive difference is that McCarthy at least tried to pretend to behave like a serious politician, and his replacement probably won’t.Gawd knows how but the GOP are currently trouncing Dems on “best for the economy” question in election polls so you’d think the smart move would be to at least pretend to want to govern - instead they shoot the leader of the only branch of government they control (and the 3rd speaker in a row they have stabbed) causing even Fox to say “why can’t the GOP get anything done in the House”.
Unfortunately McCarthy replacement is likely to be even worse and Ukraine funding in particular is at risk.
I think if he’d brought the Senate CR to a vote (which had Ukraine funding) instead of his own (which didn’t) a few Dems would have either voted present on MTV or realised they were busy washing their hair that day.True, however to be fair I still think that leaving him to his fate was good politics from the Dems, even if they were kinda railroaded into doing it. Realistically McCarthy was behaving like a reactionary anyway, like with the absolutely absurd impeachment enquiry that they have no evidence for, and giving the far right lunatics committee positions etc. the only massive difference is that McCarthy at least tried to pretend to behave like a serious politician, and his replacement probably won’t.
True, however to be fair I still think that leaving him to his fate was good politics from the Dems, even if they were kinda railroaded into doing it. Realistically McCarthy was behaving like a reactionary anyway, like with the absolutely absurd impeachment enquiry that they have no evidence for, and giving the far right lunatics committee positions etc. the only massive difference is that McCarthy at least tried to pretend to behave like a serious politician, and his replacement probably won’t.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.