I did chuckle when he wrote ‘ergo’People call football fans idiots but I'm proud that we have so many experts in not only overly complicated US but also the even more complicated self defence AND libel etc
I did chuckle when he wrote ‘ergo’People call football fans idiots but I'm proud that we have so many experts in not only overly complicated US but also the even more complicated self defence AND libel etc
Zat debunked this earlierTotally chilled photos of loads of white dudes casually doing the OK sign. Nothing to read into this at all
![]()
![]()
![]()
Can it not be enough for Republicans that he killed two people and walked away scot-free? Does he also have to get rich in the process?Show me where this has been proven?
It hasnt. Its just an opinion whether a photo is enough, which it cant be as it can be argued both ways.
Im not commenting on opinions aside from my own that he should find a pro bono lawyer to take his case.
Then sue a lot of people.
If someone were to go online and post that a stranger is a white supremacist, racist, vigilante AND post false information about an ongoing case.
Youre saying that this (whilst not malicious) is also not going to be actionable as a case?
That Biden (and others) could simply claim its not defamation and somehow explain why they posted this information online and gave interviews stating this information?
That would be an interesting watch.
The kid may not win but he'd be taking settlements left and right.
If someone were to go online and post that a stranger is a white supremacist, racist, vigilante AND post false information about an ongoing case.
Youre saying that this (whilst not malicious) is also not going to be actionable as a case?
That Biden (and others) could simply claim its not defamation and somehow explain why they posted this information online and gave interviews stating this information?
That would be an interesting watch.
The kid may not win but he'd be taking settlements left and right.
Nick Sandmann didn't receive anything like millions from the settlements - before or after his lawyers got paid.Nick Sandmann? The one who settled lawsuits of $275mil with CNN and $250mil with the Washington post?
That Nick Sandmann who is likely worth a fair amount in the millions now.
Seeing as you mentioned "its clear you dont understand the defamation/libel/slander laws in this country" then could you enlighten me as to why both of those companies settled out of court -- if it was obvious they would win then they would go to court.
"Nuisance payments" would be like those, in the millions ?
How about if he filed against Biden and individuals who have come out making false statements, surely in the US theres a way to sue people even if you dont suffer monetary loss?
Representing a private individual, I was under the impression that the lawyer just needs to prove negligence rather than actual malice in any actionable case against Biden for example.
I read an article that broke it down similarly. Of course “Nick Sandmann sues media for a billion dollars” or some ludicrous sum like that makes the headlines, but the settlement is always MUCH, MUCH lower.Nick Sandmann didn't receive anything like millions from the settlements - before or after his lawyers got paid.
The media entities didn't go to court because going to court would cost them more in time and money, even though they'd assuredly win, than simply paying out small sum "nuisance payments" to end the charade.
Most legal folk I've seen and know are confident the settlements were in the low 6 figures - with 40%, most likely, going to Sandmann's lawyers.
Horrific case. As you say it was a modern day lynchingAn other trial going on in America at the moment the killing of Ahmaud Arbery.
I haven’t watched this case as much as the Rittenhouse one. From what I have seen it was basically a modern day lynching and anything but a guilty1st degree verdict for all would be a travesty.
Judge just made an important ruling in that case although final decision is on MondayAn other trial going on in America at the moment the killing of Ahmaud Arbery.
I haven’t watched this case as much as the Rittenhouse one. From what I have seen it was basically a modern day lynching and anything but a guilty1st degree verdict for all would be a travesty.
Judge just made an important decision in that case
Shows his true colours as a really despicable human being.I’d forgotten how awful Zat is whenever he leaves the Everton section
Wannabe edgelord childI’d forgotten how awful Zat is whenever he leaves the Everton section
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.