Whether you agree with the ruling or not, celebrating it when 2 people died is disgusting. There is no limit to how low that some people sink to. Hope karma comes for these people
He also tweeted thisWhether you agree with the ruling or not, celebrating it when 2 people died is disgusting. There is no limit to how low that some people sink to. Hope karma comes for these people
So can someone turn up at an abortion clinic with an AR15, provoke a few of the protestors, get into an altercation, shoot a few of them then claim self defence?
How about heading to an anti vax protest? The womens march? A Q-Anon rally?
This gives people the right to turn up at a large gathering/protest, incite violence then kill in the name of self defence
He also tweeted this
2 of the people that Kyle shot dead were serial rapists. Maybe it isn't exactly disgusting.Whether you agree with the ruling or not, celebrating it when 2 people died is disgusting. There is no limit to how low that some people sink to. Hope karma comes for these people
What a bullshit claim. Kyle was giving out medical aid at the site of the riots and he was there to protect the businesses in Kenosha.Think it's fair to say this lad is scum. It's fair to say the people he shot were/are scum. Just a lot of scum going on.
One of the people Kyle shot was giving out medical aid and, unlike Kyle, had medical training.What a bullshit claim. Kyle was giving out medical aid at the site of the riots and he was there to protect the businesses in Kenosha.
Even by being there he was breaking the law.What a bullshit claim. Kyle was giving out medical aid at the site of the riots and he was there to protect the businesses in Kenosha.
For me, this sentence perfectly sums up the entire situation.That's insane, but that's the law for you.
For me, this sentence perfectly sums up the entire situation.
We can show as much dismay and disgust at the verdict as we want, but criminal law is not as clear cut as society may believe or want it to be.
Ultimately, it boiled down to the threshold where he could not legitimately argue his actions were not in self-defence, and the prosecution couldn't meet it.
At that point, they weren't able to negate his right to defend himself based on all the other evidence.
Only in America could you grab a gun, travel to a different state and murder 3 protestors including an EMT and claim self defence. The US is one grim place
It’s just madness that the part where he traveled out of state to an already tense protest, picked up a weapon of war on his way and then antagonized protestors by openly walking around with said weapon of war doesn’t factor into the equation. It seems to me that somewhere along that line terrible decisions the law should shift into “you’ve messed with the bull, now if you get the horns, that’s your fault” territory.Only in America could you grab a gun, travel to a different state and murder 3 protestors including an EMT and claim self defence. The US is one grim place
It’s just madness that the part where he traveled out of state to an already tense protest, picked up a weapon of war on his way and then antagonized protestors by openly walking around with said weapon of war doesn’t factor into the equation. It seems to me that somewhere along that line terrible decisions the law should shift into “you’ve messed with the bull, now if you get the horns, that’s your fault” territory.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.