Martin Alvito
Player Valuation: £50m
but would the fairness doctrine have had any remit over the likes of Fox or Rush Limbaugh?
Re: Limbaugh, yes. Anything remotely like Limbaugh was expressly forbidden. He was a serial failure as a radio personality for decades prior, and became an instant star thereafter.
Re: Fox: They'd have had to be a whole lot cagier about it. In the Fairness Doctrine era, bias showed up in what you chose to run, what not, and who presented it. There would be no Tucker Carlson, but they could talk about, say, dogwhistle issues all they wanted as long as the opposing viewpoint was presented. Having the opposing viewpoint presented by a doofus might have been going a little far, but a clever media mogul probably would have found a way to end-run it.
It's worth noting that the Fairness Doctrine applied to editorial/opinion content (which it mandated the presentation of, but in the above format) and not which stories ran and which did not. It's not hard to imagine a Fox News in the form of CNN of the day, just painting a different reality picture by highlighting different stories and having their own Crossfire where the liberal player(s) made a winning case about as often as the Washington Generals won basketball games.

This is how justice works for people of color in the US.