Current Affairs General US politics (ie, not POTUS related)

Status
Not open for further replies.
BirkenheadBlue said:
Scumbag. Wonder if we'll find out who some of the attendees were at his "parties"?

Reckon there'd be one or two.... interesting... names. Names where you'd say "orange aren't you surprised that guy was there?"
Click to expand...
Am guessing it would be a bipartisan list of the wealthy and well connected given how eager those in power have been to sweep this under the rug. Whoever is involved I hope they finally get their just deserts.
 
BirkenheadBlue said:
Scumbag. Wonder if we'll find out who some of the attendees were at his "parties"?

Reckon there'd be one or two.... interesting... names. Names where you'd say "orange aren't you surprised that guy was there?"
Click to expand...
No matter what your political sympathies, the failure of the DOJ to adequately prosecute this man is a black mark in our legal and judicial history. Trump's Labor secretary should pay with his job for his involvement in the corrupt initial deal, and I await further word on how this goes down. The SDNY does not play around with this scum.

My spidey sense tells me that his ability to escape the law is largely due to incriminating blackmail information on powerful figures without regard to party. And no, I don't think that Trump is one of them. He's a neighbor of Trump, but had been banned from Mar a Lago permanently many, many years ago for his proclivities. He skated in 2008, IIRC. That won't stop the wish list from including Trump, and he'll be labeled "Trump associate" by the media until he does his final perp walk to solitary, but don't lose the scent for wanting to nail Trump with this. What scum. What absolute scum.

Do this for those girls. What if they were your children?
 
mezzrow said:
No matter what your political sympathies, the failure of the DOJ to adequately prosecute this man is a black mark in our legal and judicial history. Trump's Labor secretary should pay with his job for his involvement in the corrupt initial deal, and I await further word on how this goes down. The SDNY does not play around with this scum.

My spidey sense tells me that his ability to escape the law is largely due to incriminating blackmail information on powerful figures without regard to party. And no, I don't think that Trump is one of them. He's a neighbor of Trump, but had been banned from Mar a Lago permanently many, many years ago for his proclivities. He skated in 2008, IIRC. That won't stop the wish list from including Trump, and he'll be labeled "Trump associate" by the media until he does his final perp walk to solitary, but don't lose the scent for wanting to nail Trump with this. What scum. What absolute scum.

Do this for those girls. What if they were your children?
Click to expand...
Don’t get me wrong, I want him and anyone else involved absolutely nailing to the wall, whoever they are.

Given Trump’s previous comments, behaviour and the many accusations against him, I’d be utterly unsurprised if he were one of them.
 
BirkenheadBlue said:
Don’t get me wrong, I want him and anyone else involved absolutely nailing to the wall, whoever they are.

Given Trump’s previous comments, behaviour and the many accusations against him, I’d be utterly unsurprised if he were one of them.
Click to expand...
Understood. Trump has no history on perving after children, though. That's the key. Not that I would want my daughter to take a limo ride with the man, but this isn't about Trump. If she was 14, I'd be more sanguine than if she was 22, if you get my drift. With Epstein the opposite would apply.

I note that Bill Clinton was very proactive in putting a statement out that contradicts evidence found in the flight logs from the Lolita Express. Who are you going to believe? I'll believe the evidence. Let's get Epstein's little black book. It's out there.

It's not about Big Dog, either. What I said about Trump also applies to him. It's about getting the truth out and nailing this POS and those who enabled him. He'll narc out all his scummy playmates, but conviction will have to be evidence based.

It's American Yewtree, mate. The only difference is a matter of style and preference.
 
Last edited:
mezzrow said:
Understood. Trump has no history on perving after children, though. That's the key. Not that I would want my daughter to take a limo ride with the man, but this isn't about Trump. If she was 14, I'd be more sanguine than if she was 22, if you get my drift. With Epstein the opposite would apply.

I note that Bill Clinton was very proactive in putting a statement out that contradicts evidence found in the flight logs from the Lolita Express. Who are you going to believe? I'll believe the evidence. Let's get Epstein's little black book. It's out there.

It's not about Big Dog, either. What I said about Trump also applies to him. It's about getting the truth out and nailing this [Poor language removed] and those who enabled him. He'll narc out all his scummy playmates, but conviction will have to be evidence based.
Click to expand...
If memory serves, one of the claims of sexual assault levied against Trump was relating to the rape of a 13 year old? Struggling to find the specifics as every search for trump underage accusation just brings up the Epstein news at the moment. There have also been a lot of stories about him walking into the dressing room unannounced at Miss Teen USA (or some similar kids beauty pageant) that he owned.

Oh and re: Clinton, if he was involved, I hope he goes to jail for a long time.
 
mezzrow said:
Understood. Trump has no history on perving after children, though. That's the key. Not that I would want my daughter to take a limo ride with the man, but this isn't about Trump. If she was 14, I'd be more sanguine than if she was 22, if you get my drift. With Epstein the opposite would apply.

I note that Bill Clinton was very proactive in putting a statement out that contradicts evidence found in the flight logs from the Lolita Express. Who are you going to believe? I'll believe the evidence. Let's get Epstein's little black book. It's out there.

It's not about Big Dog, either. What I said about Trump also applies to him. It's about getting the truth out and nailing this POS and those who enabled him. He'll narc out all his scummy playmates, but conviction will have to be evidence based.

It's American Yewtree, mate. The only difference is a matter of style and preference.
Click to expand...

I love ya Mez, but I am never going to understand this bit.
How can you support a person to be POTUS that you would not want your children, even your adult children to be around? I don't have kids, but seems like that would be an automatic disqualifier.
 
RAFUH said:
I love ya Mez, but I am never going to understand this bit.
How can you support a person to be POTUS that you would not want your children, even your adult children to be around? I don't have kids, but seems like that would be an automatic disqualifier.
Click to expand...
I fear the obverse more than I fear having Crusty The Clown as President. It's not about Trump. It's about the alternative.

We see different entities as fascist, is my most succinct answer. Love ya, RAF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top