Well if you read his quote, he was basically saying the admin team werent Everton fans because they either didnt live local or go the match.
I'll take full responsibility for his banning as i did it so if Danny or Dylan want to unban him then they can feel free but i thought he deserved a banning.
Im not having a go mate, i just feel what you called him in the other thread was as much in breach of the rules as anything, if i missed a context or part of the thread i apoligise.
I am not a local and as such dont go to as many matches as i would love but i didnt take offence or i didnt feel he was calling non-locals not Everton fans, i pretty much watch all the game live anyway. So his point was wrong and presumptious but for me not offensive.
I know he can be obnoxious, disagreeable and lack the ability to say fair enough lets agree to disagree and i am certainly not trying to tell the admins or the mods how to police the forum, but hes not the only one in breach of the rules here, which isnt equitable.
I know in mitigation you could argue its a culmination of a series of events, and warnigns have probably been given, but you shouldnt have called him an idiot it was calling him out for having a go, when he doesnt need the provacation. In fairness he has walked away from a few fights since his return.
Not that i would be heartbroken not to read his posts, as i say i think he disagreed for the sake of it, but some of his points were thought provokeing and offered a different slant, as i say
some.
Its sad that we have lost some valuable members like suits through a banning and i think as a stand alone incident in this case it wasnt a ban.
Just an opinion.