Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £35m
At least Jenas did say something about the possible penalty for Siggy...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Weight and Jenas pair of turds toeing the party line.
Pair of absolute bellends.
Just listening to these whoppers on MotD. Not even interested in getting a debate going over the VAR decision - still smarting over their darlings being put to the sword yesterday.
Need to get their tongue out of the Mancs arse. They were gash second half.
I've asked this a few times. Who actually watches motd now. The Liverpool and man United show I mean?Just listening to these whoppers on MotD. Not even interested in getting a debate going over the VAR decision - still smarting over their darlings being put to the sword yesterday.
I'd love Moss to come out and explain the difference between the two? Here is the play in question (5:40):
I believe his moving out of the way is actually expected if your not to be considered part of the play. The var took it away, at least from the gesture of players) because they considered Gylfs mere presence obstruction [of view]. That certainty comes from the referees reaction when DeGea points to his eyes. Unfortunately a “natural” or “without malice” obstruction of view does not fall into the rules (and especially since Gylf is dropped there by the opponents). It was a valid goal as far as I’m concerned.Had Lovren did not attempt to try to kick the ball and let the ball roll to the feet of Harry Kane instead, it would have been ruled out for offside. The difference in this position above is that Harry Kane doesn't interfere with Lovren's defensive play. Kane is in offside position only after he makes a contact with the ball but he caught "the reverse pass" or misdirected pass from Lovren's intentional attempt to kick the ball away. In contrast, the ball has deflected from Maguire to Sigurdsson, who should have not moved at all. He did it because he knew he would block the ball. See this game between FC Koln vs Schalke @0:15.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrIBg74b1IM
By the letter of the law it's a goal. Sitting on the ground didn't affect De Gea's line of sight. He saw Bernard's kick leave his boot and reacted to it by movingHe’s literally sat in front of De Gea and has to pull his foot out of the way to stop it hitting him. It has to be offside by the letter of the law