Obviously I am biased about the decision going against us but I still can't see where the Clear and Obvious application of the laws demanded an offside call to refuse a goal
Take one thing at a time.
Was GS fouled?
Was he active?
Did he interfere?
Did Maguire play the ball?
Was De Gea affected by GS?
And in what order does all this mess require the laws to be applied
In other words
Was it a penalty?
Is getting out of the way of the ball still active (when, for example, not touching a through ball and (say) putting your hands in the air to signal non participation when you know you are obviously offside is NEVER ruled as active)
Is GS in the line of sight of a keeper who is not correctly positioned to save a shot (it's hardly a matter for a referee to decide if a keeper has made a mistake)
Take one thing at a time.
Was GS fouled?
Was he active?
Did he interfere?
Did Maguire play the ball?
Was De Gea affected by GS?
And in what order does all this mess require the laws to be applied
In other words
Was it a penalty?
Is getting out of the way of the ball still active (when, for example, not touching a through ball and (say) putting your hands in the air to signal non participation when you know you are obviously offside is NEVER ruled as active)
Is GS in the line of sight of a keeper who is not correctly positioned to save a shot (it's hardly a matter for a referee to decide if a keeper has made a mistake)