Ashtonian
Banned on request
So why did you vote for something that's more likely to be terrible than not then?
Trying to understand why you'd voluntarily vote to throw your country under the bus and see what happens.
I see it more as a vote against what we were told to think rather than simply wanting to leave. It is a leap into the unknown if we left sure but at the same time a lot of the reaming arguments I believe discredit the country. We will lose this, , lost that, worker rights etc. Except it is basically saying it takes a continent to be able to install common sense and beneficial things for its own people. Industry could grow , trade isn't doomed as long as we can negotiate it well.
But all of that is unknown now, and it is an opportunity for politicians to actually do their job outside their comfort zone now.
@Ashtonian I like what you're saying, but do you think the 52% who voted to Leave will be content with not.. leaving?
Also, I'm not so sure about Germany and France. With the UK gone, they'd be the two largest contributors by an even larger margin than currently.
Would the German's be happy they are paying even more out because of it? Knock on effects as they say.
I think to split the vote so to speak how many people voted leave based on genuine reasons and how many were just ignorant or racist? Certainly enough of the latter to swing the vote in the other way . If proper arguments were laid out to the people of the country that you could see where it benefitted us then a second vote would certainly remain.
Sadly if they had done that in the first place rather than threatening to raise taxes then we would not have come to this position.
