Dude. Plastering judges' faces all over the the front page (disapprovingly listing one as "openly gay") because they had the nerve to uphold the law of the land. If you can't see that as the populist rabble-rousing that it is then there's no hope for you.
Well I'm sure being 'openly gay' isn't a crime - wasn't last time I looked. Elton John for one is still a free man, and still appears in that same paper without me seeing any objection from him. Many pro-EU tory MP's are openly gay - I'll bet they'll happily take interviews from the paper to enhance their PR & promote tory policy, tomorrow, next week, next month etc...
Honestly, people really need to rise above this 'intimidation'.
I'm sure the judges at the supreme court will take into account the mail's 'intimidation' when they make judgement. A judgment that the electorate made when they
voted 'advised' the government to leave the EU.
Ignoring the will of the people MIGHT lead to serious disorder; so this 'intimidation' could well be a mere bagatelle in relation to what MIGHT follow if the people are ignored once again.
Then you'll have something to cry about. The people voted out because they're pissed off by parliament telling them what they THINK is best. They gave us a vote, and the majority of the MP's wishes were flushed down the pan with the result .
Except they don't like that result so they'll waste time & money by going against the will of the electorate.