Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've mentioned the work of Harvard's Dani Rodrick a few times, and he suggests that globalisation can only continue if people accept two of the following:

- economic integration
- democratic politics
- the nation state

I'd quite happily do away with the latter.

As for Hungary - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37158330 (a lot of other sources covered the story if the BBC isn't your poison)

The problem is that globalization as it currently occurs is looking to get rid of the second choice, not the third.
 
That's an excellent response btw. I think we will end up with some compromise that all the politicians can claim to be in their nations interest. Selective movement or whatever will probably do it. Like you I totally believe that the EU will not be stupid over WTO. I like the point about who makes from current immigration regarding apprenticeships but fear that ways would just be found to get around it, nice idea though.......

Thanks mate, I know it wasn't addressed at me but I am probably on a similar side to desk so worth responding.

I am not Owen Jones's biggest fan but he made some reasonable points on this, saying why not look at grants to areas/councils with higher levels of migration? I do think there's little doubt that migrants add to the country but also for lots of people thats not their direct experience. In a world where people don't trust politicians it just becomes seen as a lie and a response that treats people as if they are stupid (which is kind of the liberal response) doesn't help.

I think you are probably correct. They definitely will not restrict the movement of financial professionals though as it would be completely stupid too.
 
Cracking article for a second referendum written by a person who voted for Brexit - for some of the more agreeable reasons.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-tony-blair-radio-four-second-referendum-a7384676.html

I like they way he's already made his mind up that a hard Brexit will make everybody poorer without considering other opportunities. They have been very clever with this hard/soft I.e. bad/good Brexit spin before we have even sent the note. If I had to guess the author it would probably be Nick Clegg.....Sean O'Grady previously wrote about "Could Hillary Clinton start a world war? Sure as hell she could – and here’s how".....
 
In pre-historic times, identity was crucial to our social and intellectual development. Today, feeling part of something is still a hugely important facet of the human experience. Nation states are ready-made for this.

It's part of our nature to feel tied to our nationality, for it's the earliest identity we know.

In todays' globalised world, there are interesting developments like those with dual-nationalities (like myself) or migrant parents, but for most of the world people have a foundation mono-identity from birth and you can't expect to just do away with the concept so easily.

I've nothing against people feeling patriotic, privilege, pride and identity based on their nation of birth. As long as they're not hurting anyone it should be a non-issue. Should in fact be celebrated as it's because of such things that our world can boast so many fascinatingly-different cultures.

Imagine if the whole world was like London?


Hmm I take it you are not a big fan of Benedict Anderson ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top