Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well no, the process by which regulation is captured by industry (and then made less effective) is a well known and well evidenced one (as we see here with the financial industry, and in the US with various industries but especially food).

Given the importance of the sector to the Australian economy, why would anyone expect it to be properly regulated?
Maybe so, but you'd expect someone to produce a clear link between hormone injection and human health. Greenpeace or anyone with more skin in the animal welfare game.
 
Maybe so, but you'd expect someone to produce a clear link between hormone injection and human health. Greenpeace or anyone with more skin in the animal welfare game.

They do, though I wasn’t talking about that so much (butchery and preparation of meat in unsanitary conditions are more to blame).
 
@Bruce Wayne

Don't get hung up on Aus/NZ, they have been chosen first because we have a lot in common, so won't annoy the gammons when precedent's set, but others will soon follow.

Regarding food poisoning and intensive practices, it's not only medical records that one should look at, just look at how consumers have had to change their practices to try to avoid it- in the US they have to cook pork to buggery to eliminate an endemic worm, how measures need to be taken in the EU (and elsewhere) to avoid salmonella and how we have to take anti f&m measures because the government chose not to police import quality.
 
As I pointed out, Australia only exports about 60% of our total beef consumption, and the vast majority of that goes to Asia. The idea that they'd flood our market would require them to double their meat production and send all of that here. That doesn't seem likely to me. This deal is being massively blown out of proportion.
Sets a precedent for other countries, its not going to be the only trade forthcoming,
 
@Bruce Wayne

Don't get hung up on Aus/NZ, they have been chosen first because we have a lot in common, so won't annoy the gammons when precedent's set, but others will soon follow.

Regarding food poisoning and intensive practices, it's not only medical records that one should look at, just look at how consumers have had to change their practices to try to avoid it- in the US they have to cook pork to buggery to eliminate an endemic worm, how measures need to be taken in the EU (and elsewhere) to avoid salmonella and how we have to take anti f&m measures because the government chose not to police import quality.
To be honest, I hope we move to a world before too long where meat consumption is hugely reduced. It's not great from a health perspective (however it's produced) and the environmental impact is huge.
 
They do, though I wasn’t talking about that so much (butchery and preparation of meat in unsanitary conditions are more to blame).
What worries me about Australian beef is grown with added hormones, banned by us when in the EU?



Anyway, UK farming was warned by Mr Off on his trotters Cameron, and as Uk farming voted for being out of the EU, they have reaped what they have sown.


 
Last edited:
What worries me about Australian beef is grown with added hormones, banned by us when in the EU?

This is what I just don't get.

In 1999, the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health (SCVMPH) carried out a review on hormone treated beef.

It concluded that estradiol-17β - one of the six hormones commonly used in US beef production – “has to be considered a complete carcinogen” (having the potential to cause cancer). This is because the hormone “exerts both tumour initiating and tumour promoting effects”.

The data available didn’t allow the Committee to quantify the risk of the hormone when it is consumed - for example in hormone treated beef - but the properties are extremely worrying.
So 22 years ago there was some research that suggested there might be a harmful effect from hormone-treated beef, but there wasn't enough data to quantify the risk, and yet in the intervening 22 years not one single study has attempted to get enough data to actually quantify the risk? That's madness. It's like finding the Covid vaccines have a risk of causing blood clots, and then just leaving it at that and forgetting about it.
 
This is what I just don't get.


So 22 years ago there was some research that suggested there might be a harmful effect from hormone-treated beef, but there wasn't enough data to quantify the risk, and yet in the intervening 22 years not one single study has attempted to get enough data to actually quantify the risk? That's madness. It's like finding the Covid vaccines have a risk of causing blood clots, and then just leaving it at that and forgetting about it.
Oh yeh lets keep testing its still causing cancer of course UK farmers cant use the hormone but just as long its not you being tested on... Smoking alcohol next, its free market time everyone...
 
Oh yeh lets keep testing its still causing cancer of course UK farmers cant use the hormone but just as long its not you being tested on... Smoking alcohol next, its free market time everyone...
What on earth are you on about?
The very article you yourself shared said that one of the six hormones used in US beef production (is it also used in Australian beef production? You don't say and neither does the Soil Association) might carry a health risk but they don't know how big a risk that is because of insufficient data.

So yes, get sufficient data and test it properly. o_O I can't believe people are even arguing about this. It's so weird.
 
For instance the World Health Organisation already states that red meat has carcinogenic properties that may lead to cancer. That's not Lionel Messi, hormone juiced up cows, that's all cows. So presumably as you're okay with cows that are free to frolic in great British fields and make guest appearances in the Archers, you're happy with "some" cancer risk from eating red meat.


How much does hormone-treatment of cows raise that risk? Who on earth bloody knows?
 
For instance the World Health Organisation already states that red meat has carcinogenic properties that may lead to cancer. That's not Lionel Messi, hormone juiced up cows, that's all cows. So presumably as you're okay with cows that are free to frolic in great British fields and make guest appearances in the Archers, you're happy with "some" cancer risk from eating red meat.


How much does hormone-treatment of cows raise that risk? Who on earth bloody knows?
Our farmers don't because they are banned from using it and on "bloody" the assumption we were happy to prevent this “profit making” making drug being used by our own farmers since 1989, it hardly seams the right thing now to allow imports from farmers who use it. Not a level "bloody" playing field is it?
 
To be honest, I hope we move to a world before too long where meat consumption is hugely reduced. It's not great from a health perspective (however it's produced) and the environmental impact is huge.
You keep saying that, but in reality, only specific practices are detrimental, some beneficial, just like the other areas of farming, unfortunately, the West has gone almost all-out on an intensive pollutant concentrating disease ridden monocultural disaster.
 
The University of Exeter has just released a study into why the people of Cornwall ( @Barnfred 55 ) voted to leave. It's quite depressing that nearly 80% say there's too much immigration, despite not experiencing any of that themselves, while hardly any refer to the huge amounts of money the region got from the EU, which is almost certainly going to effect them.


"Many people who took part in the study wanted a strong affective economy, good public services and accessible jobs. They seem to have linked a Leave vote with expressing concerns about the association between immigration and the economy. These issues don't appear to be grounded in people's daily experiences."

Think it's about time you accepted that most people in this country don't want mass immigration
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top