Did you miss the bit about giving a Tory donor a few hundred million for PPE that didn't work? This isn't about buying things effectively, it's about giving huge contracts to firms with no track record of supplying those products, just because they're donors to the party you're in.
Sorry Bruce, I’ve been dipping in and out between lessons with my granddaughter. My answer to you was in respect of your first sentence. I hadn’t watched the video, which I have now done. Personally I believe the the PPE was a complete fiasco, money was thrown around like confetti and perhaps for the right reasons, but not necessarily to the right people. When you are desperate for stuff and normal supply routes cannot provide (Germany refusing to export PPE for instance) you need to try something different. I am not aware of normal PPE supply companies who were not included in this process, there the issue seems to be the additional routes, mates, colleagues or whatever that set up quickly or did something for which they may not have had a background. However the country could not afford the time to go through normal procurement processes and it is a fact of life that a drowning man does not particularly care from where the newly arrived life buoy was manufactured or supplied from.
My view on this is simple and non political, review each and every contract, were the goods delivered as requested and in a suitable quality and value for money cost/price bracket. If the answer is yes, then move on. If the answer is no then investigate further for any acts of illegality either from the ordering or supply point of view. Anybody not delivering the goods or found to be overcharging, having not returned monies to the government should be prosecuted....