Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reminds me of a Blackadder sketch
Eisenhower. Whats holding up D Day Blackadder?
Blackadder. We can't get bike parts from Holland, General.
Eisenhower. Just get on with it
Blackadder. But we can't get our saddles from Italy.
Eisenhower. Your having me on Blackadder There's a war to be won you know
Blackadder. We can't General. We need to put an Import and Export label on everything
Eisenhower. Oh I give up
 
Reminds me of a Blackadder sketch
Eisenhower. Whats holding up D Day Blackadder?
Blackadder. We can't get bike parts from Holland, General.
Eisenhower. Just get on with it
Blackadder. But we can't get our saddles from Italy.
Eisenhower. Your having me on Blackadder There's a war to be won you know
Blackadder. We can't General. We need to put an Import and Export label on everything
Eisenhower. Oh I give up
 
Reminds me of a Blackadder sketch
Eisenhower. Whats holding up D Day Blackadder?
Blackadder. We can't get bike parts from Holland, General.
Eisenhower. Just get on with it
Blackadder. But we can't get our saddles from Italy.
Eisenhower. Your having me on Blackadder There's a war to be won you know
Blackadder. We can't General. We need to put an Import and Export label on everything
Eisenhower. Oh I give up
Don't give up your day job.
 
The words temporarily suspend stick out for me. Could be good news as they may decide to open a logistics centre in the UK
That would be the logical thing to do. But then I don't understand why it was ever sent to Italy in the first pace if it was only going to be shipped back over here. Can't be good from an ecological point of view if nothing else.
 
Of course we were aware of the subtext (at least I certainly was), but there was no malice involved and that's why we thought it was funny and not in any way sinister.

It was only your posting that pointed to any intentional malice. But that posting was also sufficiently vague that it could very easily have been aimed at me. When I asked you to explain your initial post, your next one was equally vague. Your 2 posts below.




Bottom line here is that you tried to make out there was malice where there wasn't. I mistakenly took offence by it, for which I apologise, as I accept your explanation that it wasn't aimed at me.

Let's draw a line under it and move on.
I didn't. But there you go.

You didn't ask me to explain my post, you asked:
'Why would I, or anybody else for that matter, have a computer that autocorrects Dido and replaces it with Dildo?'

I gave you an answer to that.
 
I feel like whatever I say you're going to find a way to be offended so probably best to leave it alone.

Enjoy your day
I'm not offended. Just confused because I don't understand your post.

You either believe either Pete or I were showing malice in our posting exchange yesterday. Or you don't.

If it's the latter, I really don't understand. I'm sorry. I don't know how else to say it.

I regularly get the feeling that when I'm in conversation with you, you are being purposely abstruse with me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top