Current Affairs EU In or Out

[Alan Whittle]

I didn’t list them as such either, they highlight that actually we are not that bad. I don’t want a little Englander approach. I believe in working with the World and have been fortunate to actually do so. I want people from anywhere in the world to be able to contribute and become a part of the U.K., not just those from the EU....

Straight from the Boris playbook that @peteblue. Sounds reasonable, bit of personal puffery, ultimately meaningless. Good work.

 

[orly]

Could be a very big day for this tomorrow.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

I see project fear is taking shape down in 60% Leave Kent.



I voted Leave and am a proud Brexiter then project fear has literally turned up at the bottom of me garden.

LOL

 

[Blue 1]

I see project fear is taking shape down in 60% Leave Kent.



I voted Leave and am a proud Brexiter then project fear has literally turned up at the bottom of me garden.

LOL

AKA "The Farage Garage".

 

[Jebus_lives]

Ouch.

"This constitutionally dangerous approach is compounded by the fact that the Government seeks in this Bill to put ministerial powers above relevant domestic law—a step that is fundamentally at odds with the rule of law "

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

The utterly ridiculous tosser is now confirming no deal.

What a lying, dishonest cabal of morons.

 

[Jebus_lives]

The utterly ridiculous tosser is now confirming no deal.

What a lying, dishonest cabal of morons.

Who?

 

[peteblue]

Ouch.

"This constitutionally dangerous approach is compounded by the fact that the Government seeks in this Bill to put ministerial powers above relevant domestic law—a step that is fundamentally at odds with the rule of law "

Now I’m not suggesting for one moment that there was any kind of bias on that Select Committee. But look who was on it, none other than Lord Pannick.

The same Lord Pannick who Represented Ms Gina Miller, in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017], and in R (Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) & Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) [2019].

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Who?

Johnson

 

[orchard]

Forgot to put it in the oven, or couldn't work the oven?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

A no deal outcome would be a failure of Statecraft - Johnson 2019

This cabal of arsonists, liars, charlatans and self serving spivs need locking up.

 

[Jebus_lives]

Now I’m not suggesting for one moment that there was any kind of bias on that Select Committee. But look who was on it, none other than Lord Pannick.

The same Lord Pannick who Represented Ms Gina Miller, in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017], and in R (Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) & Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) [2019].

What do you find surprising about a leading constitutional lawyer commenting on the UK undermining its own constitution and international law?

I know we go through this every time, but I note, as you often do, you've gone straight to bias and credibility in an attempt to smear, rather than address the content; so which parts of the criticism do you disagree with?

 

[Jebus_lives]

Johnson

Just seen. It really is no change from where we were in January.

 

[orchard]

Now I’m not suggesting for one moment that there was any kind of bias on that Select Committee. But look who was on it, none other than Lord Pannick.

The same Lord Pannick who Represented Ms Gina Miller, in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017], and in R (Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) & Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) [2019].

The clue's in the concept of committee. Ad hominem, yabber, yabber ffs

 

[tsubaki]

Can’t wait for this to be all the fault of remainers / “the left” / Muslims