And Blair achieved much domestically too, but is still defined by and large by Iraq. You've just glossed over the million or so that died as a result of partition, and the bungled departure from Israel that has caused two generations worth of conflict in the region. Not judging either way, I just find it interesting.
At the time Iraq was on the go there were no undue domestic pressures for Blair to worry about. Certainly not in comparison to what Attlee faced.
Massive housing shortage as a result of the blitz.
Massive loss of business properties due to same.
Massive demob of Forces personnel with no jobs to go to.
The major problem for 90% of the population was 'the next meal'. I can remember being sent shopping by my mother. Queue was 20 yards outside the shop. Even if you had the money and the coupons you just hoped that they hadn't sold out before it was your turn. Every shopping trip took one or two hours because of queue's. Faced with that lot, on a daily basis, I don't think you can blame Attlee for foreign policy failures.
Bruce, I just don't think you have any idea how bad things were. I don't know if you think the current pandemic is bad? Well, it pales into insignificance compared with the years after the war.
On a brighter note, a true story about rationing. In the early 1950's I remember sweets coming off ration. This would be the first time since rationing started about 10 years earlier. I had some pocket money so raced up to the sweet shop for the thrill of buying some sweets without coupons. When I got to the shop the queue was, as usual, about 20 yards long outside the shop. When I finally reached the counter, I found that the shopkeeper had introduced his own 'rationing' system to ensure everyone got something. The problem was, his rationing was less than the official rationing!