Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
And Blair achieved much domestically too, but is still defined by and large by Iraq. You've just glossed over the million or so that died as a result of partition, and the bungled departure from Israel that has caused two generations worth of conflict in the region. Not judging either way, I just find it interesting.

It’s interesting that you suggest blame should be apportioned to Attlee for both of those long-standing issues, certainly.
 
My vote was actually for Harold Wilson, who kept the U.K. out of Vietnam...

So there hasn't been a 'proper' Labour leader in just shy of 50 years. Or over 1/3 of it's history. What is it that defines a 'proper' Labour leader and what have the party been getting so wrong?
 
What a legacy for the history of the country. For school kids to be told they helped when it mattered most. Unlike over here where we demonised the most vulnerable and desperate. Not our finest hour
 
What a legacy for the history of the country. For school kids to be told they helped when it mattered most. Unlike over here where we demonised the most vulnerable and desperate. Not our finest hour

And they've done remarkably well during COVID as well. Merkel will be looked back on incredibly fondly, in years to come, whereas our descent into xenophobia will be remembered for the stain it is.
 
@peteblue can you let me know how I can get rid of this Simon Case bloke? Guessing it's easy now we've taken back control and all.

Indeed. The political party who won the last General Election as a result of a vote by the U.K. electorate, approved of a leader who became PM, the PM appointed this guy. Vote out of power the current government and the new incoming PM can do as he wishes, retain or get rid. It’s all down to who we vote for.....
 
Indeed. The political party who won the last General Election as a result of a vote by the U.K. electorate, approved of a leader who became PM, the PM appointed this guy. Vote out of power the current government and the new incoming PM can do as he wishes, retain or get rid. It’s all down to who we vote for.....
And this was different to voting for the EU Parliament who would then choose the members of the European Commission etc, how?
 
Indeed. The political party who won the last General Election as a result of a vote by the U.K. electorate, approved of a leader who became PM, the PM appointed this guy. Vote out of power the current government and the new incoming PM can do as he wishes, retain or get rid. It’s all down to who we vote for.....

I asked how I personally can get rid of him. My constituency in London has been a Labour/Liberal constituency since 1935. So what does my vote get me in terms of dictating anything now we've taken back all of this power?
 
The main difference is, quite simply, that they are foreigners. People can try twisting it any way they like, but that’s what it always comes down to

It's quite hard to disagree with this. I've always had sympathy for people who want hyper-local governance (it's not for me but there can be a political and non-bigoted argument behind it) but not when someone wants to govern 4 distinct nations with one parliament yet think the EU doesn't make sense
 
It's quite hard to disagree with this. I've always had sympathy for people who want hyper-local governance (it's not for me but there can be a political and non-bigoted argument behind it) but not when someone wants to govern 4 distinct nations with one parliament yet think the EU doesn't make sense

It was always my understanding that one of the main criticisms of the Tories from a wonkish point of view is that they exercise an extremely centralised form of government, with Whitehall controlling and dictating far more than is sensible. Indeed, that came to the fore during COVID, with the German-style distributed system doing much better than the British doing everything at PHE approach.
 
So there hasn't been a 'proper' Labour leader in just shy of 50 years. Or over 1/3 of it's history. What is it that defines a 'proper' Labour leader and what have the party been getting so wrong?

1598889912757.webp

Just look at the list. Foot and Kinnock, idiots, John Smith would have been a great PM but tragically died, Blair was a Tory, Brown was a deadly fool, Miliband was a joke, Corbyn (see Foot) and now they have an empty vessel who is more Tory than Boris....Pick the right leader and develop policies that don’t bankrupt the nation nor return it to the union dominated years.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top