Yes. Sainsbury, Waitrose, Tesco and Morrisons are experts in this area so their opinion is worthless.
Current Affairs EU In or Out
- Thread starter micknick
- Start date
- Status
roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
They also have serious skin in the game.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
But of course my point being that old, well educated and experienced legal people are fit to sit on the Supreme Court, while similarly old, well educated and experienced professionals such as myself get decried as racists who didn’t know what they were voting for.......
roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
Well your sample poll of old, experienced, and well educated folk seems to be the Supreme Court judges, and er, You.
Anyrate, you won, well done, clap clap, vote Brexit Party.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Thank you, and tomorrow we shall see how they decide....
I love that you think drawing comparison between some of UKs leading legal minds and that of your own life strengthens your position and not at all makes it ridiculous.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
It depends on your capabilities. I’m happy to draw such a comparison. You, however, cannot comprehend that Leave voters such as myself either exist or support EFC....there’s a big world out there......
That's not a difficult concept. The referendum was roughly 50-50, of course there are Everton fans that voted Leave.
With the greatest of respect, there are few educated/qualified enough to draw comparison with Supreme Court Judges, but enlighten me Pete, what do you think allows you to do so?
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
The Supreme Court consists of people at the top of their field. There are people at the top of the Financial field, there are people at the top of the Medical field, who are no different to the Supreme Court judges. Most professional groupings have people at the top of their field. I happen to be such a person. You may not like it, believe it or even get your head around it, but these professional groupings are at similar levels. Apart from pay of course, as Supreme Court judges are the paupers of our game......
I'd argue that you have to be more qualified to become a Supreme Court Judge, at the top of your field, than say, the top of your field in horticulture.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
That’s Joey, not me.....
It was illustrating a point.
but you admitted that you didn't give the Irish border a thought when you voted.
Cut him some slack, he's one of the UKs leading thinkers. He's dealing with incredibly complex decisions on a daily basis, like how many dots to put at the end of his sentences.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Then it was a bad illustration as it tried to decry horticulture, which one day will save the planets people via new drugs, or just keeping them fed. All professions have to go through obtaining degrees and professional qualifications. Then comes experience and ongoing training and additional qualifications, it never stops. It’s all about changes within the profession and the latest laws, technology, research, or whatever, it keeps moving on, it never stops. I would put no profession above another because they all have differing challenges. Christiaan Barnard transplanted a heart, is he at least at the level of a SC Judge or maybe higher. Every profession has people at the top, for a period of time before they retire. They all do for their profession what everyone else does for their own. An SC Judge is just that, someone who understands and applies or interprets the law as produced by the politicians. People who oversee technology or medicine are no lesser people...
- Status