So a typo has you confused. Bless. So what is your actual point? You asked who 'their' referred to, I responded and said it was documented. You've gone on a merry ego dance for what reason? You disagree? Great

So what?
My initial point, which you replied to, was that the establishment of a European 'super state' with an army is not 'about as Nazi as it gets'. You instigated the conversation so I see no reason why you've since become confrontational and supercilious towards my replies.
Your typo didn't have me confused, neither did your 'their' - it was simply a question of clarification. However your lack of any credible connection between the 3rd Reich and the current European Union did.
Now I am aware it's well documented that certain corners of the EU want to establish a European Army, but my original point, remains unaddressed, no matter how much you want to recount history and talk of different Facist ideology and pseudo Facist corporations.
All of the evidence I see from Europe is regarding State Nationalism rather than European Nationalism, in fact most of the Facist elements across Europe want to reduce the liberal elements of the Union and effectively reduce their de jure sovereignty away from the EU. Possibly because European Union effectively arose from the shadow of Nazism in Europe, hence the Treaty of Fundamental Rights.
Article 2 might be of interest:
"human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality […], in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail".
Doesn't sound particularly Facistic although I'll agree that centralised authority and one which could be described as a Corporatocracy backed by military power has the potential to be worrying, it doesn't necessarily mean it is Facist (the U.S.A would be the strongest evidence to the contrary).