I'm not even close to suggesting that.
I was amazed at the platform given to prominent Islamophobes and racists at the Leave march by organisers. Yet it's greeted as 'growing support' and championed for publicity it gives and 'strengthening the Leave argument'. It should be much more vocally called out otherwise you let these people dominate the narrative. If I found myself at a rally and supporting a position championed by any of that I'll, I'd seriously consider if it was the right thing, at the very least I would be keen that they couldn't control the future direction.
I would also note that this thread has much more disagreement among remain advocates, whereas the Leave contingent champion and applaud anyone who shares their veiw, no matter how bizarre, uniformed or ludicrous a stance it is.
Case in point, go back through the thread and find one leave voter telling @Joey66 he is wrong about the EU banning salt, because he is, everyone but him knows he is, but it's happily ignored as he is seen by the leave contingent as 'one of us'
Its a stance that has just become more and more entrenched:
Leave broke electoral rules, Russian collusion, experts warnings, attacking parliament, attacking the Lord's (then heralding the Lord's), heralding the queen (then attacking her), complete disregard for almost everything that was said prior to the actual referendum which has no morphed into 'everyone wanted no deal', dismissing any warnings as 'project fear'
Despite all of that, for many the position hasn't softened it's hardened to the point that they now would actively rather inflict more misery and hardship on people because of an unwillingness to admit, even in the smallest degree that they may have been wrong.