It's not lies it's the worst PM in history since post war .......lies and damn lies from her......Just lies and scaremongering, apparently.
It's not lies it's the worst PM in history since post war .......lies and damn lies from her......Just lies and scaremongering, apparently.
But I've seen a couple of headlines that the EU are going to use their current position of strength to dictate how we interact together in the future. I'm not sure if they are referring to if we stay in the EU long term, or just controlling our euro MPs in the short term whilst we continue to sort out Brexit.
If they do play hardball now, then all it will do is vindicate the views of many of the people who voted to leave. It will drive another wedge between the EU and many people in the UK. Long term, that cannot be good, especially if we stay in the EU, which is becoming more likely all the time.
Every day, with every new turn in events, this mess just gets worse and worse doesn't it.

I don't know how, in the space of 2 posts, our conversation has got onto this. You have a point of view which I happen to disagree with, but not enough to get into a conversation with you over it. Interesting though that you consider it to be an arrogant ignorant folly for the UK to have no deal as a bargaining chip, but totally acceptable for the EU do so.
My issue with your original post was what I considered to be an excessive image of what a no deal Brexit would look like.
That good less pollution, and @Bruce Wayne complaining about me again - this am only two leavers on here rest your usual remainer suspects.........![]()
No-deal Brexit could force the cancellations of up to 5 million flights
Iata said that airlines 'do not know' what type of Brexit they are planning forwww.independent.co.uk
www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-45019603
I don't know how, in the space of 2 posts, our conversation has got onto this. You have a point of view which I happen to disagree with, but not enough to get into a conversation with you over it. Interesting though that you consider it to be an arrogant ignorant folly for the UK to have no deal as a bargaining chip, but totally acceptable for the EU do so.
My issue with your original post was what I considered to be an excessive image of what a no deal Brexit would look like.


Massive statement to make that Khal. Impossible to prove too. I can think of at least half a dozen things they have done or not done that can apportion some blame to them. But I'm not going to go there because I'll just get bombarded in here because the EU is sacrosanct. And I'm getting to the stage where I really can't be arsed arguing any more.I will say it again.....the EU are blameless in this fiasco.
TBH mate I'm all Brexited out at the mo, and have other more important things going on in my life so I haven't been taking much notice of events over the last week.
But I've seen a couple of headlines that the EU are going to use their current position of strength to dictate how we interact together in the future. I'm not sure if they are referring to if we stay in the EU long term, or just controlling our euro MPs in the short term whilst we continue to sort out Brexit.
If they do play hardball now, then all it will do is vindicate the views of many of the people who voted to leave. It will drive another wedge between the EU and many people in the UK. Long term, that cannot be good, especially if we stay in the EU, which is becoming more likely all the time.
Every day, with every new turn in events, this mess just gets worse and worse doesn't it.
Have you read 'How It Is' by Samuel Beckett or 'In Search of lost Time' by Proust.That good less pollution, and @Bruce Wayne complaining about me again - this am only two leavers on here rest your usual remainer suspects.........
I guess we will never know how a no-deal brexit pans out.
Only if the EU allow it to happen.
My original debate was with @Joey66 and based on the effecive removal of the no deal scenario due to the Yvette Cooper bill achieving royal assent. My point being that we entered into these negotiations with the EU with an alarming degree of arrogance, totally dismissive of the standpoint of the other party (The EU). That was both ignorant and naive. Thinking that we could bully them with the threat of us leaving on WTO terms.
Both sides had no deal on the table as worse case scenario. With any negotiation you need that fall back position. What I don't understand is why it's acceptable for the EU to have it but not for the UK. The negotiations with the EU have all been about getting a deal. There is nothing in the future agreement statement that says we want to leave on a no deal.
No deal was a big deal for us, but not so much for the EU and therefore they always had the upper hand during negotiations. As for my "apolyptic" visions of a no deal - take a look at the article from @JEBUS_LIVES. The only reason that we would have had european flights in and out of the uk following a no-deal scenario was down to the EU allowing that to happen. They were in control not us.
Of course they are in control of air traffic over mainland Europe. But that doesn't mean they would ever consider stopping air traffic from entering the UK in the case if a no deal Brexit. It's not like we're at war ffs.
Massive statement to make that Khal. Impossible to prove too. I can think of at least half a dozen things they have done or not done that can apportion some blame to them. But I'm not going to go there because I'll just get bombarded in here because the EU is sacrosanct. And I'm getting to the stage where I really can't be arsed arguing any more.
Who did you vote for again?It's not lies it's the worst PM in history since post war .......lies and damn lies from her......
100% agree mate. They were always going to play hardball anyway because they of the political situation in some of their other member states. But the fact is, a good trade deal would suit both sides, plus the UK has been a pain in the EU arse for decades. As a Union, many of them believe they are better off with us out of it. But the way we went about it they always had the upper hand in negotiations as you say. We should never have issued articled 50 until we had a proper plan supported by a big majority in parliament.I've always felt that the reason the EU always seemed to have us by the balls was because how divided we were as a country, and how divided Parliament was, and all the shenanigans that has been going on there. If we as country and Parliament had stood as one and just got on with Brexit, then we maybe could have had a more stronger hand against the EU, and they may have been a tad more eager to negotiate rather than playing hardball.
Both sides had no deal on the table as worse case scenario. With any negotiation you need that fall back position. What I don't understand is why it's acceptable for the EU to have it but not for the UK. The negotiations with the EU have all been about getting a deal. There is nothing in the future agreement statement that says we want to leave on a no deal.
Of course they are in control of air traffic over mainland Europe. But that doesn't mean they would ever consider stopping air traffic from entering the UK in the case if a no deal Brexit. It's not like we're at war ffs.
Khal. I'm probably the only person in here who has supported that deal so maybe I'm not the one you should be addressing that to. And nowhere have I ever said that the EU are the major culprits here. The UK govt closely followed by the rest of parliament hold that trophy.Eh?
![]()
A Brexit breakthrough has been reached
Prime Minister and European Commission President announce that 'sufficient progress' has been made to unlock the negotiationswww.independent.co.uk
Theresa May and the EU have announced that a breakthrough deal has finally been reached to move the Brexit talks onto future trade and a transitional period, after days of tortuous negotiations.
The Prime Minister arrived in Brussels before 6am on Friday, to stage a joint press conference with EU leaders – following discussions with the Democratic Unionist Party that stretched long into the night.
Standing alongside Ms May, Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission President, said “sufficient progress” had been made on all three so-called “divorce issues” – the Irish border, a financial settlement and EU citizens’ rights.
I don’t know if this counts as “proof” but it is factual and was the state of play on the night of December 7th 2017.
If that doesn’t suffice then I suggest you do your own research on that particular summit, Barney.
Suffice it for me to say that had that excellent deal gone through, we would have been out the EU at the end of March and neither the Irish Republic nor Nothern Ireland would have to worry about the border becoming an issue again.
So if you are looking fir villains in this pantomime, look not to Brussels.....look to the ERG and their useful idiots in the DUP.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.