I would say enough to swing the vote were.Are you seriously suggesting over 17 million people voted to leave the EC because if Russian interference Bruce?lol
I would say enough to swing the vote were.Are you seriously suggesting over 17 million people voted to leave the EC because if Russian interference Bruce?lol
Are you seriously suggesting over 17 million people voted to leave the EC because if Russian interference Bruce?lol
I don't think either side is prepared to give an inch tbh mate. I think the rift has gone too far for that.I think you're right. Which is precisely why it can't simply fall into a 'Brexit: leave vs Remain' standoff. If you want to address the cause of the division you need to look beyond it.
Oh I agree. Europe would be much stronger with the UK rather than without it, and a weaker Europe very much plays into Russia's hands. Even without the benefit of Cambridge Analytica I think we know enough about the Russians to realise they would be up to something underhand to try and influence proceedings.I was, of course, being facetious, but Cambridge Analytica have at least shown us that such methods are very effective, so it would be naive to say they played no part at all.

I would say not.I would say enough to swing the vote were.
yup, we'll never know, all we can do is investigate whether there was illegal campaign financing and if there was illegal manipulation of social media.I would say not.
But both are a matter of opinion and impossible to prove one way or the other.
There was also an awful lot of over the top scare mongering undertaken by the government on behalf of the remain side, paid for by the tax payers more than half of who voted the other way.yup, we'll never know, all we can do is investigate whether there was illegal campaign financing and if there was illegal manipulation of social media.
With the answers to these questions, we can gauge whether the electorate was misinformed or not.
Legally, if it were a binding referendum, it would be void.yup, we'll never know, all we can do is investigate whether there was illegal campaign financing and if there was illegal manipulation of social media.
With the answers to these questions, we can gauge whether the electorate was misinformed or not.
Firstly, it was evidenced and largely factually correct, although open to challenge based on interpretation.There was also an awful lot of over the top scare mongering undertaken by the government on behalf of the remain side, paid for by the tax payers more than half of who voted the other way.
What we don't know is how many people's decision were affected by it. I can only speak for myself and I saw through the lies and scaremongering from both sides. They were pretty obvious after all.
Oh I agree. Europe would be much stronger with the UK rather than without it, and a weaker Europe very much plays into Russia's hands. Even without the benefit of Cambridge Analytica I think we know enough about the Russians to realise they would be up to something underhand to try and influence proceedings.
One could argue that they would also be using the assets they have within Parliament to the same end![]()
Labour is going to call for a second referendum, according to multiple sources.
Just heard that. Not entirely sure what the point would be though.
If its based on the Kyle - Wilson amendment, its that Parliament cannot decide this as its deadlocked (which it is), so the only way so this can be resolved is by a second referendum - May's deal vs Remain.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.