Sorry I've been out for the evening. Permission to Appeal had been refused. The ruling will mean that political policy can now be passed through parliament without parliamentary approval or judicial review.So does this judgement go anywhere?
I was half following the live stream earlier and missed the ruling, so I may not be completely accurate, I'll have to wait for the written judgement, but effectively the principle argued is about the decision to enact Article 50 when there has been illegality around the referendum. Had it been a binding referendum it would not have stood. The rule of law has stood, but maybe not the spirit. It wasn't helped by a suspension of the broadcast during the claimant summary.
There was a bizarre moment in which the QC for the PM effectively said 'yes we accept that it is not a good decision and we accept that there was corruption and illegality in a number of areas for Leave Vote, but the PM is standing by the decision'

A cynic might say that by knowingly ignoring the illegality and proceeding with A50, it allowed the PM to remove UK citizens rights regarding free movement, along with that of the other EU countries.