Well you would, but Pete you're a man so stupid that you think the surname of the Irish Prime Minister means he isn't qualified to talk on behalf of the Irish people, while professing to talk on behalf of 17.4m British voters despite having 'one of the oldest surnames in Ireland'.
Yeh ok, but apparently not a 'British name' Tell me again why Varadkar's surname means he doesn't have Ireland's interests at heart, but you have the UK's interests at heart despite having an Irish surname?
He is right though though Pete. Your post questioning Varadkar’s legitimacy to represent Ireland was shameful.
It wasn't shameful in his eyes, he's just not clever enough to realise the cognitive dissonance.
I just thought he was drunk.
He may well be, but to paraphrase Churchill: in the morning he'll be sober, but he'll still be an idiot.
Statistically yes it is. The better educated you are/were, the more likely you are/were to vote Remain.
I have a lot of time for @peteblue a fellow Blue and explaining a political opinion that is completely adverse to my own. Politics is all about differing views but I do think he let himself down with his Varadkar heritage stance.
I think it goes to the crux of things to be perfectly honest.
You aren’t on your own linking racism to Brexit.
I think it had some part to play in it, as did the promises made by the leave campaigners:
I don't see how that furthers the discussion. You back the deal and introduce a peoples vote - then if it's still leave you go with what? May's deal was rejected so it can't be that and all other options have been rejected by the EU or UK governments.Some developments tonight, according to the Guardian:
Back May’s deal, then hold people’s vote: plan to end Brexit deadlock
Cross-party move likely to be put forward as amendment to EU withdrawal billwww.theguardian.com
It may just be a stick with which to scare the Brexiteers, but that is an elegant solution that could work.