The only army I want to be a part of is Marco Silva's Blue and White Army. AMIRITE LADS?!!!!
Lads?
Lads?
If we had a decent opposition in which I suggest you are hinting at Boris leading the country - very little chance of that.....That's some level of mental gymnastics, allow brexit or you are responsible for the next trump. If there's people out disturbed enough to vote for a repugnant figure like him, that's on them and them alone.
Joey66 the Fearmonger strikes again. If the Brexit result is overturned half the UK will be conscripted to an EU army which wants to start a war with Russia and in addition the UK will be forced to adopt the €. And then he complains about project fear in every second post. Laughable.Sounds like project fear that mate.
If it all goes to pot, we wont rejoin, we just wont leave. And you suggesting that would involve the EU making us adopting the Euro is just fantasy island tripe
Sounds like project fear that mate.
If it all goes to pot, we wont rejoin, we just wont leave. And you suggesting that would involve the EU making us adopting the Euro is just fantasy island tripe
think you are correct, but we havnt got a leader brave enough to go for it.I actually think if the UK had the right leadership, they could negotiate a very favorable deal to stay in the EU at the moment, much better than what Cameron got and possibly alleviating some of the concerns of Brexiteers
There should be 'side pot' negotiations going on and if successful, that could be put to the people. So it wouldn't be a re run of the last referendum but instead an option to remain in under a new more favorable terms or leave (with a clear path for how to)
The entire leave campaign was a lie (more money for nhs) and was funded illegally (see banks and DUP funding)You can't keep on having referendums 40 years since the 2016 one, and because the remainers don't like the result.....
They want a vote without being tied to a cronyism EU.....
If they accepted defeat with grace ....
I tell you what if the Remain had won this thread would not exsist...
Wrong even without adding the £9 million on government remain leaflets to every UK household plus the backing from establishments remain spent more on their campin than the Brexit campaign -The entire leave campaign was a lie (more money for nhs) and was funded illegally (see banks and DUP funding)
that's not funding is it its a claim just like remain stated even if we just voted leave a recession - no growth - mass unemployment etc etc at leat money has been put into the NHS,,,,,The entire leave campaign was a lie (more money for nhs) and was funded illegally (see banks and DUP funding)
that's not funding is it its a claim just like remain stated even if we just voted leave a recession - no growth - mass unemployment etc etc at leat money has been put into the NHS,,,,,
on funding which you raised-
The official campaign for Britain to stay in the EU - Britain Stronger in Europe - raised £6.9m - more than twice as much as Vote Leave's £2.8m.
Bruce I was replying to a poster who claimed Brexit spent more on the campaign what the hell have you googled now? totally irrelevant to the argument the original poster @thirdmantackle posted originally........For someone who keeps reminding us the campaign is over and leave won, you seem to spend a lot of time talking about something you regard as irrelevant Joe. It'd be nice if you could provide some benefits of leaving or some of the wonderful good news associated with it.
All I've found today is a report from the European Universities Association on the implications of a no deal.
https://eua.eu/downloads/news/brexit how universities can prepare for a no-deal scenario.pdf
They identify four main problem areas:
- People - residence permits and students paying 3rd country fees (particularly relevant for UK students in EU countries with free university education)
- Cooperation - UK access to Erasmus and Horizon 2020 programs
- Data sharing - under no deal UK would not comply with GDPR, relevant for research data and student/staff information
- Trade - supplies from the UK, eg if phytosanitary checks required under 3rd country WTO rules
Bruce I was replying to a poster who claimed Brexit spent more on the campaign what the hell have you googled now? totally irrelevant to the argument the original poster @thirdmantackle posted originally........
The entire leave campaign was a lie (more money for nhs) and was funded illegally (see banks and DUP funding)
Not really when @Bruce Wayne goes into google mode he's unstoppableJoey, are you really surprised...?
So carte blanche to lie then, they were just 'suggesting' an extra 350 mill for the nhs, if people choose to read what was advertised as a statement of fact as a statement of fact, I guess that's just the way it goesI'm going to post this again and again until it finally sinks in.
The £350 million figure was an equivalent, not a commitment to spend in a particular direction. The reason being that both campaigns in the Referendum had no executive power to distribute ANY finance in the UK Treasury.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.