This feller is called Pete.
Although he sounds a bit Joey.
That bigot again.......James brain dead O,Brian zzzzzzzz
This feller is called Pete.
Although he sounds a bit Joey.
So, Cameron did get his mate Obama to say ‘back of the queue’. Yet the Remainers still try to claim that it was Leave manipulating the result via lies and Russian backing (as yet totally unproven) as opposed to lies and American backing (now actually admitted).......I raise this not as a way to derive ‘I told you so’ pleasure but merely to point out that both sides were as bad as each other, in all respects.......
I always said she shouldn’t have been in charge of negotiations........
That bigot again.......James brain dead O,Brian zzzzzzzz
It goes back to what we were discussing yesterday. Business has made it plain, a no deal Brexit would be incredibly damaging, as it’d destroy the just in time delivery system that manufacturing plants rely on, and would add time, bureaucracy and cost to supply chains. They’re already voting with their feet by holding back on investment plans and coming up with alternatives in terms of their structures should the destructive ‘no deal’ scenario be the end result.I always said she shouldn’t have been in charge of negotiations........
In a nutshell ^
I know you don't speak for nor represent all leave voters Pete, but what do you want from Brexit and how will that help those communities? Be specific please rather than saying trading with the world or control over our laws etc. What trade barriers might we remove/construct that will help leave voting areas? What new rules (or removed rules) will benefit leave voting areas? What has been done to date to do any of the above?
I don't have to listen because any presenter who belittles any person should not be listened too whatever their political persuasion is - the mans a know it all bigot - if he on holiday the listening figures must boom, he has a band of ignorant followers imo who like listening to bullies who can control the mike if he has been ever getting beat - he shuts them off.....I doubt you even listened to that call, but funny that you call Mr O’Brian (sic) brain dead in the context of it.
Anyway, whatever happens it’s her decision.
What I want from Brexit is for my government, the one that we vote for, to be the people who determine laws, foreign and domestic policy, without it having to go via Brussels. I want my vote to actually count so that we can change course based purely on the will of the U.K. people.
I would like a sensible deal done with the EU for trade, but if they won’t then I’m still happy with WTO rules.
I want the U.K. to have it’s own voice again when it comes to World Trade.
Specifically, the trade barriers I would like removed are the need for agreements required with another 27 nations, all of whom have differing requirements which ultimately water down trade. This both slows down gaining agreements and invariably results in a less than perfect deal for the U.K. More overseas trade will vastly increase prosperity on the west side of the U.K. in places like Liverpool, through increased port activity and services, legal, financial, inland transport etc. as well as for those companies gaining addition sales.
Getting rid of the EU common fisheries policies will give new impetus and growth to the coastal communities all around the U.K. and will create many tens of thousands of new jobs directly in the fishing and processing activity and also in terms of ship building, port services, small engineering companies etc. This will specifically assist those areas that have suffered the most through EU membership.
I have no inside knowledge of the detailed preparations required for our opportunities.....
Anyway, whatever happens it’s her decision.
What I want from Brexit is for my government, the one that we vote for, to be the people who determine laws, foreign and domestic policy, without it having to go via Brussels. I want my vote to actually count so that we can change course based purely on the will of the U.K. people.
I would like a sensible deal done with the EU for trade, but if they won’t then I’m still happy with WTO rules.
I want the U.K. to have it’s own voice again when it comes to World Trade.
Specifically, the trade barriers I would like removed are the need for agreements required with another 27 nations, all of whom have differing requirements which ultimately water down trade. This both slows down gaining agreements and invariably results in a less than perfect deal for the U.K. More overseas trade will vastly increase prosperity on the west side of the U.K. in places like Liverpool, through increased port activity and services, legal, financial, inland transport etc. as well as for those companies gaining addition sales.
Getting rid of the EU common fisheries policies will give new impetus and growth to the coastal communities all around the U.K. and will create many tens of thousands of new jobs directly in the fishing and processing activity and also in terms of ship building, port services, small engineering companies etc. This will specifically assist those areas that have suffered the most through EU membership.
I have no inside knowledge of the detailed preparations required for our opportunities.....
Nobody was defending that, and it invalidates the vote further.Omits the £9.5 million spent by Cameron on behalf of the Remain campaign. Remember that leaflet through every door...?
Pot... kettle... black...
Avoid incoming money laundering regulation; remove worker's protections and rights; evade environmental obligations/lower standards.looks like something cobbled together to just get a deal done ,any deal to save her skin.
if its true i would sooner just stay in than EU than take that half in half out position.
we have to follow the EU on tarriffs without any say ect whats the point may as well stay in.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.